Tax Fraud: Sowrabh Sharma Pleaded Guilty In Visa Fraud And Tax Crimes

Owner Of Information Technology Companies Admits Visa Fraud And Tax Crimes

NEWARK, N.J. – An owner of two IT staffing and consulting companies today admitted using phony documents to fraudulently obtain H1-B visas for foreign workers and submitting false tax returns, U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito announced.

Sowrabh Sharma, 33, of New York, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Kevin McNulty in Newark federal court to a superseding information charging him with conspiracy to commit visa fraud and subscribing to false tax returns.

“For years, Sharma and others working at SCM Data and MMC systems lied about hiring full-time foreign workers in order to secure H1-B visas,” U.S. Attorney Carpenito said. “In reality and contrary to immigration laws, these workers were often ‘benched’ without pay while the companies created false documents to cover-up the scheme. This investigation, which has resulted in the conviction of an owner and several employees, including an immigration attorney, shows that businesses that use the H1-B visa program better do so with the utmost adherence to this nation’s immigration and labor laws.”

“This conviction shows that even those with powerful business interests are not immune from HSI’s long and expert investigative reach when it comes to visa fraud and worker exploitation,” said Michael McCarthy, Acting Special Agent in charge of HSI Newark. “Such activities not only have a negative impact on the U.S. economy, but are harmful to the overall work environment of companies and individuals.”

“Sowrabh Sharma misused the H-1B program in order to enrich himself at the expense of the foreign workers he sponsored for H-1B visas. His company submitted false documents to the Departments of Labor and Homeland Security in order to perpetrate this fraud. The U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General will continue to work with Homeland Security Investigations and our other law enforcement partners to vigorously pursue those who commit fraud involving the foreign labor certification programs which are jointly administered by the Departments of Labor, Homeland Security and State,” stated Peter Nozka, Acting Special Agent-in-Charge, U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General New York Region.

According to the documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

SCM Data Inc. and MMC Systems Inc. offered consultants to clients in need of IT support. Both companies recruited foreign nationals with purported IT expertise, often student visa holders or recent college graduates, and sponsored them for H-1B visas with the stated purpose of working for SCM Data and MMC Systems’ clients throughout the United States.

Sharma admitted today that from 2010 through April 2015, he and others falsely represented to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services (USCIS) that dozens of foreign workers had full-time “in-house” positions, and would be paid an annual salary, as required to secure the visas. However, Sharma and his companies only paid the foreign workers when they were placed at a third-party client, or a company that entered into a contract for services with SCM Data and MMC Systems.

Sharma also admitted that in some instances, foreign workers who were “benched” between projects and not working were told that if they wanted to maintain their H-1B visa status, they would need to come up with what their gross wages would be in cash and give it to SCM Data and MMC Systems to generate phony payroll checks.

In addition, Sharma also admitted that he intentionally overstated and claimed false expenses pertaining to SCM Data and MMC Systems on his individual tax returns for 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, resulting in a tax loss to the United States of approximately $1,114,824.

Sharma faces a maximum potential penalty of five years in prison on the visa fraud conspiracy count and three years in prison on the tax fraud count. Both charges carry a maximum $250,000 fine. His sentencing is scheduled for May 30, 2018.

U.S. Attorney Carpenito credited special agents of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), Newark Field Office, under the direction of Acting Special Agent in Charge Michael McCarthy, the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Acting Special Agent in Charge Peter Nozka in New York, and IRS – Criminal Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Jonathan D. Larsen in Newark, with the investigation.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joyce M. Malliet and Francisco J. Navarro of the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s National Security Unit in Newark.

Defense Counsel: John P. Lacey Esq., and Leo J. Hurley Esq.

Identity Theft: Abdulrasheed Yusuf Pleaded Guilty In One Count Of Aggravated Identity Theft

Man Admits Role In Identity Theft And Wire Fraud Conspiracy

NEWARK N.J. – A Georgia man today admitted using fake driver’s licenses in order to obtain checks issued in response to false statements and representations, U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito announced.

Abdulrasheed Yusuf, 29, of Lilburn, Georgia, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Katharine S. Hayden in Newark federal court to an information charging him with one count of aggravated identity theft and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

Yusuf was a member of a conspiracy to fraudulently obtain money, including by committing identity theft, impersonating account holders and obtaining money from their accounts. On Aug. 8, 2017, a member of the conspiracy contacted an entity where an individual (Victim 1) had an account. The caller impersonated Victim 1 and stated that he/she wanted to withdraw $34,636 from his/her account. The entity sent a check through a mail carrier to the account holder at his/her address.

A member of the conspiracy caused the mail carrier to hold the packages containing the check for Victim 1 at one of its branch locations. On Aug. 14, 2017, Yusuf entered the branch and, using a driver’s license with Yusuf’s picture and Victim 1’s name and address, obtained a package he believed contained the check to Victim 1. Yusuf used a separate fake driver’s license in connection with obtaining a different check similarly issued in response to fraudulent statements.

The conspiracy to commit wire fraud charge carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, and a fine of $250,000, or twice the gross gain to the defendant or twice the gross loss to others, whichever is greater. The aggravated identity theft charge carries a sentence of two years in prison, which must be consecutive to any imprisonment ordered concerning the conspiracy to commit wire fraud charge, and a fine of $250,000, or twice the gross gain to the defendant or twice the gross loss to others, whichever is greater. Sentencing is scheduled for May 10, 2018.

U.S. Attorney Carpenito credited special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Timothy Gallagher in Newark, and the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael C. Mikulka in New York, with the investigation leading to today’s guilty pleas. He also thanked the Salt Lake City, Utah, Police Department for its role in the investigation.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Kogan of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Economic Crimes Unit in Newark.

The charge and allegations contained in the complaint are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Defense counsel: David B. Glazer Esq., Livingston New Jersey

Original PressReleases…

Health Care Fraud: Thaddeus M.S. Bereday Sentenced For His Role In Health Care Fraud Scheme

Former General Counsel of Company That Operates Health Maintenance Organizations in Several States Sentenced to Prison for Role in $35 Million Health Care Fraud Scheme

The former general counsel of a company that operates health maintenance organizations in several states was sentenced to six months in prison today for his role in a $35 million health care fraud scheme.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Blanco of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Acting U.S. Attorney W. Steven Muldrow of the Middle District of Florida, Special Agent in Charge Shimon Richmond of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General’s (HHS-OIG) Miami Field Office, Special Agent in Charge Eric W. Sporre of the FBI’s Tampa Field Office and the Florida Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit made the announcement.

Thaddeus M.S. Bereday, 52, of Tampa, Florida, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge James S. Moody of the Middle District of Florida, who also ordered Bereday to serve three years of supervised release that includes one year of home confinement following his prison term and to pay a fine in the amount of $50,000. Bereday pleaded guilty on June 27, to one count of making a false statement in connection with health care matters.

According to admissions made in connection with his guilty plea, Bereday served in several positions, including as general counsel, with WellCare Health Plans Inc. (WellCare), a publicly traded corporation that operates health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in several states targeted to government-sponsored health care benefit programs such as Medicaid. Two WellCare HMOs operating in Florida, StayWell and Healthease, contracted with the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA), the Florida agency that administers the Medicaid program, to provide Florida Medicaid program recipients with an array of services, including behavioral health services.

In 2002, Florida enacted a statute that required Florida Medicaid HMOs to expend 80 percent of the Medicaid premium they received for certain behavioral health services on the actual provision of those services to beneficiaries. If the HMO expended less than 80 percent of the premium, the law required the excess funds to be returned to the Medicaid Program. Bereday and four other defendants were charged in an indictment that alleged the ways in which the defendants falsely and fraudulently schemed to submit inflated expenditure information in the company’s annual reports to AHCA in order to reduce the WellCare HMOs’ contractual payback obligations for behavioral health care services.

As part of his guilty plea, Bereday admitted that he, along with others, knowingly and willfully caused the submission of a false expenditure report for calendar year 2006 to the Florida Medicaid Program on behalf of Healthease, a WellCare HMO that was under contract to provide health care services to Medicare beneficiaries in Florida in 2006.

On May 5, 2009, the United States reached a resolution with WellCare on related charges. Pursuant to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), WellCare was required to pay $40 million in restitution, forfeit another $40 million to the United States and cooperate with the government’s criminal investigation. The company complied with all of the requirements of the DPA. As a result, the criminal Information was later dismissed by the Court following a government motion.

After a 13-week trial in June 2013, a jury found the four other defendants guilty for their roles in a scheme to defraud the Florida Medicaid Program of more than $35 million. Todd S. Farha of Tampa, Florida, former WellCare chief executive officer, was convicted of two counts of health care fraud; Paul L. Behrens of Odessa, Florida, former WellCare chief financial officer, was convicted of two counts of making false statements relating to health care matters and two counts of health care fraud; William L. Kale of Oldsmar, Florida, former vice president of Harmony Behavioral Health Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of WellCare), was found guilty of two counts of health care fraud; and Peter E. Clay of Wellesley, Massachusetts, former WellCare vice president of medical economics, was found guilty of making false statements to a law enforcement officer. In May 2014, Judge Moody sentenced Farha to 36 months in prison; Behrens to 24 months in prison; and Kale to one year and one day in prison. Clay was sentenced to serve 5 years’ probation. The defendants appealed their convictions, which were all affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit in August 2016.

This case was investigated by the HHS-OIG, the FBI and the Florida Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. Senior Litigation Counsel John A. Michelich of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jay G. Trezevant and Cherie Krigsman of the Middle District of Florida prosecuted the case.

The Fraud Section leads the Medicare Fraud Strike Force. Since its inception in March 2007, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, now operating in nine cities across the country, has charged nearly 3,500 defendants who have collectively billed the Medicare program for more than $12.5 billion. In addition, the HHS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, working in conjunction with HHS-OIG, are taking steps to increase accountability and decrease the presence of fraudulent providers.

Original PressReleases…

Financial Fraud: Patrick Lee Was Indicted For Mortgage Brokers To Prepare False Mortgage Loan Applications

Dual U.S.-Irish Citizen Extradited from Ireland to Face Mortgage Fraud Charges

BOSTON – A dual U.S.-Irish citizen was arraigned late yesterday in federal court in Boston on charges of mortgage fraud and identity theft after being extradited from Ireland. It was Ireland’s first extradition to the United States since 2012.

Patrick Lee, 44, a dual U.S.-Irish citizen formerly residing in Canton and Easton, Mass., was indicted in 2011 on 29 counts of wire fraud, six counts of unlawful monetary transactions, and 16 counts of aggravated identity theft. Lee had been living in Ireland since 2007.

It is alleged that Lee participated in a mortgage fraud scheme from 2005-2007, shortly before the real estate bubble burst. According to the indictment, Lee and others bought multi-family properties in Dorchester and South Boston and converted them into condominiums. Straw buyers were recruited and paid a fee to sign the purchase documents, although the straw buyers had no intention of living in the condominiums. Lee and others then engaged mortgage brokers to prepare false mortgage loan applications to be signed by the straw buyers, and then Lee, who was not a licensed real estate appraiser, prepared appraisals for the properties using the name and license number of an actual licensed appraiser. It is further alleged that Lee arranged with certain real estate attorneys to conduct closings for the transactions by using false and misleading documents, and then loan applications were sent to mortgage lenders, who funded the loans based on the false appraisals and other misrepresentations. The loan proceeds were paid to Lee and the other sellers, and the straw buyers never moved into the properties or paid the mortgage loans. Eventually, the properties went into foreclosure, and the lenders lost their money.

It is further alleged that some closing documents represented that Lee would receive a certain portion of the loan proceeds as the seller, but in fact he received more. The indictment also charges that Lee prepared appraisals for certain properties that he himself bought or sold, but the appraisals falsely represented that the appraiser, who was represented to be someone other than Lee, was independent and not related to the seller or the buyer.

For some of the wire fraud counts, the charging statute provides for a sentence of no greater than 30 years in prison, five years of supervised release, and a fine of $1 million. The remaining wire fraud counts provide for a sentence of no greater than 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $250,000. The charging statute for unlawful monetary transactions provides for a sentence of no greater than 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $250,000; and the charge of aggravated identity theft provides for a mandatory sentence of two years in prison, up to one year of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based on the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

Acting United States Attorney William D. Weinreb; Joel P. Garland, Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigations in Boston; Stephen A. Marks, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Secret Service, Boston Field Office; and U.S. Marshal John Gibbons for the District of Massachusetts made the announcement today. The U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs provided assistance in securing Lee’s extradition to the United States. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sandra S. Bower and Christine Wichers of Weinreb’s Criminal Division are prosecuting the case.

The details contained in the indictment are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Original PressReleases…

Financial Fraud: Madoff Victim Fund (MVF) Receive More Than $770 Million

Department of Justice Compensates Victims of Bernard Madoff Fraud Scheme With Funds Recovered Through Asset Forfeiture

Payments Are the Single Largest Distribution of Forfeited Funds in the History of the Department of Justice’s Victim Compensation Program

The Department of Justice today announced that on Nov. 9, the Madoff Victim Fund (MVF) began its initial distribution of $772.5 million in funds forfeited to the U.S. Government in connection with the Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BLMIS) fraud scheme. These funds will be sent to 24,631 victims across the globe. This distribution represents the first in a series of payments that will eventually return over $4 billion to victims as compensation for losses they suffered from the collapse of the BLMIS. The MVF has received over 65,000 petitions from victims in 136 countries.

These payments mark the single largest distribution of forfeited funds in the history of the Department’s victim compensation program.

Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, Acting U.S. Attorney Joon H. Kim for the Southern District of New York and Assistant Director in Charge William F. Sweeney Jr., of the FBI’s New York Field Division made the announcement.

“Thanks to civil asset forfeiture, the Department of Justice is announcing today the record-setting distribution of restitution to victims of Bernard Madoff’s notorious investment fraud scheme,” said Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein. “We have recovered billions of dollars from third parties – not Mr. Madoff – and are now returning that money to tens of thousands of victims. This is the largest restoration of forfeited property in history.”

“Bernie Madoff committed one of history’s largest and most devastating frauds,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Kim. “This Office not only prosecuted Madoff himself and others who helped perpetrate his fraud, but has remained committed to recovering money for his victims. To date, this Office has recovered more than $9 billion for the innocent victims of Madoff’s fraud, and today’s distribution of $770 million, the single largest distribution of forfeited funds in the Department’s history is part of our ongoing commitment to not only prosecute criminals but also find relief for victims.”

“No amount of money in the world could ever reverse the catastrophic effects Madoff’s historic Ponzi scheme had on individuals and businesses alike,” Assistant Director in Charge Sweeney. “But now, nearly a decade after this crime was exposed, it is our hope that victims will finally be able to see the light at the end of a long, dark tunnel.”

For decades, Bernard L. Madoff used his position as Chairman of BLMIS, the investment advisory business he founded in 1960, to steal billions from his clients. On March 12, 2009, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felonies, admitting that he had turned his wealth management business into the world’s largest Ponzi scheme, benefitting himself, his family and select members of his inner circle. On June 29, 2009, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin sentenced Madoff to 150 years in prison for running the largest fraudulent scheme in history. Judge Chin ordered Madoff to forfeit $170.799 billion as part of Madoff’s sentence.

Of the approximately $4.05 billion that will be made available to victims, approximately $2.2 billion was collected as part of the historic civil forfeiture recovery from the estate of deceased Madoff investor Jeffry Picower. An additional $1.7 billion was collected as part of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and civilly forfeited in a parallel action. The remaining funds were collected through a civil forfeiture action against investor Carl Shapiro and his family, and from civil and criminal forfeiture actions against Bernard L. Madoff, Peter B. Madoff and their co-conspirators.

The MVF’s payouts would not have been possible without the extraordinary efforts of the U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, and the FBI in the prosecution of these crimes and the recovery of assets supporting the forfeiture in this case. The MVF is overseen by Richard Breeden, former Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, in his capacity as Special Master appointed by the Department of Justice to assist in connection with the victim remission proceedings.

More information about MVF and its compensation to victims of BLMIS is available on the MVF website at www.madoffvictimfund.com, such as eligibility criteria, process updates, and frequently asked questions. Further questions may be directed to the MVF at 866-624-3670 or info@madoffvictimfund.com (link sends e-mail).

Financial Fraud: BRIAN BLOCK Sentenced For Inflating a Key Metric Used to Evaluate The Financial Performance of Publicly Traded REITS in ARCP

Former Chief Financial Officer Of American Realty Capital Partners Sentenced For Accounting Fraud

Joon H. Kim, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that BRIAN BLOCK, the former chief financial officer of the publicly traded real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formerly known as American Realty Capital Partners (“ARCP”), was sentenced to 18 months in prison for inflating a key metric used to evaluate the financial performance of publicly traded REITS in ARCP’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). BLOCK was convicted by a jury in June, following a three-week trial before U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken, who imposed today’s sentence.[1]

Acting Manhattan U.S. Joon H. Kim said: “Block, the CFO of a major REIT, deliberately cooked the books to mislead investors and the SEC. Investors in our securities markets must be able to trust that corporate officers will not lie about the financial health of a publicly traded company. And corporate officers who do lie face time in a federal prison, as Brian Block has learned.”

According to allegations contained in the Indictment, and evidence presented during the trial in Manhattan federal court:

In 2014, ARCP was a publicly traded REIT headquartered in Manhattan, New York. ARCP’s securities traded under the symbol “ARCP” on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (“NASDAQ”) exchange.

ARCP, like many REITs, measured its financial performance through metrics besides, or in addition to, traditional measurements of company performance calculated using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). ARCP calculated and reported to the investing public a non-GAAP measure called adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, which was designed to more accurately reflect ARCP’s cash flow and financial performance by presenting ARCP’s income before consideration of non-cash depreciation and amortization expense and by excluding certain one-time charges and expenses. REITs such as ARCP commonly reported their AFFO figures, including AFFO per share, to the investing public and in filings with the SEC. ARCP also provided forward-looking guidance to the investing public regarding their anticipated AFFO performance in upcoming time periods.

Prior to the filing of ARCP’s Form 10-Q setting forth ARCP’s financial statements for the second quarter of 2014 (the “Second Quarter 10-Q”), BRIAN BLOCK, along with Lisa McAlister and others, came to understand that the method used by ARCP to calculate AFFO in the first quarter of 2014 and in certain previous quarters was erroneously inflated. Another employee of ARCP (“CC-1”) had brought this methodological error to the attention of BLOCK, McAlister, and others shortly before the filing of ARCP’s first quarter 2014 10-Q (the “First Quarter 10-Q”), but no corrective change was made to the First Quarter 10-Q while the issue was under review. Following the filing of the First Quarter 10-Q, CC-1 concluded, and advised BLOCK, McAlister, and others, that the reported AFFO per share calculation for the first quarter of 2014 was overstated by approximately $0.03 per share. Instead of $0.26 per share, which was publicly reported by ARCP to its shareholders and the investing public, and which placed ARCP on track to meet its full-year AFFO per-share guidance, the correct AFFO for the first quarter of 2014 was $0.23 per share.

Despite his knowledge of a material error in ARCP’s previous filings with the SEC, BLOCK took no steps to advise the Audit Committee of ARCP’s Board of Directors, or ARCP’s outside auditors, of the error in the First Quarter 10-Q. Moreover, BLOCK, McAlister, and CC-1 then knowingly facilitated the use of the same materially misleading calculations in ARCP’s Second Quarter 10-Q. For example, on July 24, 2014, a draft of ARCP’s Second Quarter 10-Q was circulated to members of ARCP’s Audit Committee. The draft included an AFFO calculation for the six-month period ending June 30, 2014, that incorporated AFFO figures from the first quarter of 2014 that BLOCK, McAlister, and CC-1 knew to be erroneously inflated.

On July 28, 2014, BLOCK met with McAlister and CC-1 in his office in Manhattan for the purpose of finalizing the financial figures that were to be included in ARCP’s Second Quarter 10-Q. Utilization of a proper method to calculate ARCP’s second quarter 2014 AFFO would have exposed that the reported AFFO and AFFO per share figures from the first quarter were inflated. Accordingly, during the meeting, BLOCK, McAlister, and CC-1 inserted into a spreadsheet BLOCK was using to calculate AFFO and AFFO per share for the first and second quarters of 2014 and for the first six months of 2014 (“YTD 2014”) figures that fraudulently inflated the AFFO and AFFO per share calculations that were to be included in the Second Quarter 10-Q and the related ARCP press release. The fraudulent numbers BLOCK, McAlister, and CC-1 used to inflate the AFFO and AFFO per share figures had no basis in fact, were without documentary support, and did not tie to ARCP’s general ledger accounting system, as BLOCK knew and understood at the time. The fraudulent numbers included in the spreadsheet prepared by BLOCK were then incorporated into ARCP’s Second Quarter 10-Q, which was filed with the SEC the following day. As a result of the manipulative efforts of BLOCK, McAlister, and CC-1, ARCP’s SEC filings included AFFO and AFFO per share figures for the second quarter of 2014 and for the first six months of 2014 that were fraudulently inflated.

The Second Quarter 10-Q was signed by, among others, BLOCK. Additionally, on a certification accompanying the 10-Q, BLOCK falsely certified, among other things, that the Second Quarter 10-Q did not contain any materially untrue statements or material omissions. He further falsely certified that he had disclosed to ARCP’s auditors and the audit committee of its board of directors: “Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.” In a second certification accompanying the 10-Q, BLOCK falsely certified that: “The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.”

With regard to YTD 2014 specifically, the fraud resulted in an intended overstatement of AFFO by approximately $13 million and an intended overstatement of AFFO per share by approximately $0.03, or approximately 5 percent of total AFFO per share. By reporting AFFO per share of $0.24 in the second quarter, after having reported AFFO per share of $0.26 in the first quarter, BLOCK and his co-conspirators misled ARCP’s shareholders and the investing public by falsely representing that ARCP’s AFFO per share for the first six months of 2014 was consistent with analysts’ expectations and on track to meet ARCP’s guidance for AFFO per share for calendar year 2014, when in fact, they were not.


In addition to the prison term, BLOCK, 45, of Hatfield, Pennsylvania, was sentenced to three years of supervised release, and a $100,000 fine. Restitution will be determined at a future date.

Mr. Kim praised the investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and also thanked the SEC.

This case is being handled by the Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Brian Blais, Edward Imperatore, and Daniel Tehrani are in charge of the prosecution.

Original PressReleases…

Financial Fraud: NAVNOOR KANG Pled Guilty For Participating In a Massive Pay-For-Play Bribery Scheme Involving The NYSCRF

Former Director Of Fixed Income And Head Of Portfolio Strategy At The New York State Common Retirement Fund Pleads Guilty In “Pay-For-Play” Bribery Scheme

Joon H. Kim, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that NAVNOOR KANG, the former Director of Fixed Income and Head of Portfolio Strategy at the New York State Common Retirement Fund (“NYSCRF”), pled guilty today before U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken for participating in a massive “pay-for-play” bribery scheme involving the NYSCRF, the nation’s third largest public pension fund.

Acting Manhattan U.S. Attorney Joon H. Kim said: “As an investment professional with New York State Common Retirement Fund, Navnoor Kang owed a duty to the public employees whose pension money he oversaw. But in this case of public corruption meets securities fraud, Kang sold himself and his duty to safeguard public retirement money for luxury vacations, jewelry, cash and even drugs. He has now admitted to his crimes and is a convicted felon. ”

According to allegations contained in the Indictment charging KANG and statements made during his plea proceeding:

The NYSCRF

The NYSCRF is a pension fund administered for the benefit of public employees of the State of New York. From January 2014 through February 2016, KANG served as Director of Fixed Income and Head of Portfolio Strategy for the NYSCRF. In that capacity, KANG was responsible for investing more than $53 billion in fixed-income securities and was entrusted with discretion to manage those investments on behalf of the NYSCRF. KANG owed a fiduciary duty to the NYSCRF and its members and beneficiaries, and was required to make investment decisions in their best interests and free of any conflict of interest. New York State law and NYSCRF policies prohibited KANG and other NYSCRF employees from receiving any bribes, gifts, benefits, or consideration of any kind.

The Scheme to Steer NYSCRF Fixed-Income Business in Exchange for Secret Bribes

From 2014 through 2016, KANG and others participated in a scheme to defraud the NYSCRF and its members and beneficiaries, and to deprive the NYSCRF of its intangible right to KANG’s honest services. The scheme involved, among other things, an agreement among KANG, Deborah Kelley, a managing director of institutional fixed income sales at New York-based broker-dealer (“Broker-Dealer-1”), Gregg Shonhorn, a vice president of fixed income sales at a New York-based broker-dealer (“Broker-Dealer-2”), and others to pay KANG bribes – in the form of entertainment, travel, lavish meals, prostitutes, nightclub bottle service, narcotics, tickets to sports games and other events, luxury gifts, and cash payments for strippers and KANG’s personal expenses – in exchange for fixed-income business from the NYSCRF. Such bribes – which totaled more than $100,000 – were strictly forbidden by the NYSCRF, and were paid secretly and without any disclosure to the NYSCRF and its members and beneficiaries concerning the conflicts of interest inherent therein.

In exchange for the bribes paid by Kelley, Schonhorn, and others, KANG used his position as Director of Fixed Income and Head of Portfolio Strategy at the NYSCRF to promote the interests of Kelley, Schonhorn, and their respective brokerage firms. KANG, in exchange for the bribes he received, agreed to steer fixed-income business to Broker-Dealer-1 and Broker-Dealer-2. In fact, KANG steered more than $3 billion in fixed-income business to Broker-Dealer-1 and Broker-Dealer-2, from which Kelley, Schonhorn, and their respective employers earned millions of dollars in commissions from the NYSCRF. In so doing, KANG, with the knowledge and approval of Kelley and Schonhorn, breached his fiduciary duty to make investment decisions in the best interest of the NYSCRF and its members and beneficiaries, and free of conflict, and deprived the NYSCRF of its intangible right to KANG’s honest services.

As the bribes paid by Schonhorn to KANG increased, so too did Broker-Dealer-2’s fixed-income business with the NYSCRF. The value of the NYSCRF’s domestic bond transactions with Broker-Dealer-2 skyrocketed from zero in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013, to approximately $1.5 million in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2014, to approximately $858 million in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015, and to approximately $2.378 billion in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016. Broker-Dealer-2 became the third largest broker-dealer with which the NYSRCF executed domestic bond transactions for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016, having not even been on the approved list in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013. As the NYSCRF’s third largest broker-dealer in this asset class, Broker-Dealer-2 brokered approximately eight percent of the total value of the NYSCRF’s domestic bond transactions – a figure greater than that of all but two of the major international banks and brokerage houses on the list. Similarly, the value of NYSCRF’s domestic bond transactions with Broker-Dealer-1 increased from zero in the fiscal year ending March 1, 2014, to approximately $156 million in the fiscal year ending March 1, 2015, and to approximately $179 million in the fiscal year ending March 1, 2016.

KANG’s trades resulted in the payment of millions of dollars in commissions to Broker-Dealer-1 and Broker-Dealer-2, of which Kelley and Schonhorn personally earned approximately 35 to 40 percent.

The Obstruction of Justice

In late 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) opened an investigation into the entertainment and benefits that Kelley had provided KANG, and the SEC subpoenaed both KANG and Kelley for their testimony. In advance of their testimony, KANG and Kelley agreed to align their stories and testify falsely before the SEC in order to conceal their scheme. In late 2015 and early 2016, KANG and Kelley each falsely testified under oath before the SEC about expenses Kelley had paid for KANG. Moreover, after a federal grand jury investigation was opened, KANG instructed Schonhorn to testify falsely before the grand jury, and KANG admitted that he had hidden relevant evidence.


KANG, 37, of Glendale, California, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, and one count of conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. KANG is scheduled to be sentenced on February 23, 2018, by Judge Oetken.

Kelley and Schonhorn have each pled guilty for participating in the scheme. Kelley was sentenced by Judge Oetken to three years of probation.

Mr. Kim praised the investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and noted that the investigation is continuing. He also thanked the SEC, which filed civil charges against Kang, Kelley, and Schonhorn in a separate civil action, and the Office of Inspector General for the Office of the New York State Comptroller.

This case is being handled by the Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Edward A. Imperatore and Joshua A. Naftalis are in charge of the prosecution.

Original PressReleases…

Mortgage Fraud: Surjit Singh And Rajeshwar Singh Convicted In Four Counts Of False Statements On Loan And Credit Applications

Three Defendants Convicted on All Counts for Mortgage Fraud Scheme Involving 14 Properties

THREE DEFENDANTS CONVICTED ON ALL COUNTS FOR MORTGAGE FRAUD SCHEME INVOLVING 14 PROPERTIES

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal jury in Sacramento convicted three Northern California residents today of crimes relating to their involvement in a mortgage fraud scheme, U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert announced.

After a seven-day trial, the jury found Surjit Singh, 71, of Dublin, and his son, Rajeshwar Singh, 43, of Pleasanton, each guilty of four counts of mail fraud, four counts of bank fraud, and four counts of false statements on loan and credit applications. Anita Sharma, 55, of Gilroy, was found guilty of two counts of mail fraud, two counts of bank fraud, and two counts of false statements on loan and credit applications.

“Today’s verdict is yet another step in the efforts taken by this office and our partners at the FBI to bring to account those whose fraudulent activities contributed to the financial decline which had such a tremendous impact on our communities,” said U.S. Attorney Talbert. “We are gratified by the verdict and thankful for the hard work and dedication of our investigative partners.”

“One of the FBI’s top priorities is to combat major white-collar crimes such as mortgage fraud,” said Special Agent in Charge Sean Ragan of the FBI Sacramento Field Office. “Mortgage fraud has negatively impacted entire communities in our region by artificially influencing home values and threatening the investments of lawful buyers. To ensure a bright future for our region, identification and investigation of mortgage fraud schemes is imperative. We will continue to investigate such crimes to both deter would-be fraudsters from acting and ensure those who commit fraud face justice.”

According to court documents, in 2006 and 2007, Surjit Singh recruited individuals with good credit to act as straw buyers for residential properties owned by his family members and associates. Rajeshwar Singh, a licensed real estate agent, assisted in the scheme by submitting loan applications for the straw buyers. Anita Sharma, a dental assistant at the time, was one of the straw buyers. Because Sharma and the other straw buyers could not afford the homes based on their true incomes, the Singhs submitted fraudulent loan applications and supporting material to lending institutions that included false statements about the straw buyers’ income, employment, liabilities, and intent to occupy the homes as their primary residences.

At least 14 properties were involved in the scheme. Anita Sharma alone purchased five homes in San Jose, San Ramon, Elk Grove, Sacramento, and Modesto. Other straw buyers purchased or refinanced properties in Stockton, Modesto, Patterson, Lathrop and Tracy. All of these homes were ultimately either foreclosed upon or sold in a short sale where the bank lets homeowners sell their homes for less than is owed on the mortgage.

Sharma was paid for her involvement in the scheme. Rajeshwar Singh received financial benefits through broker commissions for the transactions and as the seller of seven of the properties. He also continued to occupy the San Ramon property at a time when Anita Sharma should have been living there. Surjit Singh benefitted through payments out of escrow directed to shell companies, such as SJR Investments and BK Investments, associated with his daughter and significant other, whose initials are SJR and BK respectively. These payments were purportedly for contracting services, which did not occur. He also benefitted through rental payments made to him and his significant other by the renters of the homes, as the straw buyers were not living in the homes. In addition, many of his family members received money by selling properties and had money directed to them out of escrow. According to court documents and evidence produced at trial, the defendants were responsible for the origination of more than $9.3 million in fraudulently procured residential mortgage loans.

This case is the product of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorneys Lee S. Bickley and Kelli L. Taylor are prosecuting the case.

The defendants are scheduled for sentencing on January 26, 2018. They face a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The actual sentence, however, will be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables. The court remanded Surjit Singh into custody.

Investment Fraud: ROBERT WALTER MURRAY Pled Guilty To Securities Fraud

Virginia Man Pleads Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To $100 Million Market Manipulation Scheme Involving Fitbit Stock

Joon H. Kim, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that ROBERT WALTER MURRAY pled guilty today in Manhattan federal court to securities fraud. In November 2016, MURRAY conducted a scheme to manipulate the market for the stock of Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”) by filing a sham tender offer with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The sham tender offer falsely reported that another entity had made a bid to purchase all outstanding Fitbit stock at a significant premium to the then-existing market price. As a result, the price of Fitbit stock temporarily but significantly increased in price, allowing MURRAY to sell for a profit options that he had previously purchased. MURRAY’s sham tender offer, moreover, resulted in a temporary inflation in Fitbit’s market capitalization of over $100 million.

Acting U.S. Attorney Joon H. Kim said: “As Robert Murray admitted today, he manipulated the market in Fitbit stock by making a false filing with the SEC about a tender offer. After manipulating Fitbit’s stock price and temporarily inflating its market capitalization by over $100 million, Murray sought to take a quick profit from trading in Fitbit stock. Murray’s ill-advised and criminal attempt to game the system has ended in a federal securities fraud conviction.”

According to the allegations in the Complaint and Indictment filed in Manhattan federal court, previous court filings, and statements made in public court proceedings:

On November 8, 2016, MURRAY, falsely purporting to be an officer at a China-based entity called ABM Capital, created an account on the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (or “EDGAR”) system. The next day, MURRAY submitted a filing on EDGAR that reported that ABM Capital had offered to purchase Fitbit for approximately $12.50 a share, a significant premium to the price of Fitbit stock at the time. This filing was made public on November 10, 2016, and, when it was, Fitbit’s stock temporarily increased in response to the news. While Fitbit’s stock had closed at approximately $8.55 a share on November 9, 2016, it reached a high of approximately $9.27 per share, with significantly increased trading volume, after the false tender offer filing was made public. MURRAY’s filing, however, was entirely fictitious, and was instead meant only to increase the value of options in Fitbit stock that he had purchased just before filing the sham tender offer.

MURRAY, moreover, took significant steps to hide his connection to the tender offer filing. He created a separate email account to register with the SEC and to file the sham tender offer, taking care to disguise his actual IP address when accessing it.


MURRAY, 24, of Chesapeake, Virginia, pled guilty to one count of securities fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a maximum fine of $5 million. In addition, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, MURRAY agreed to forfeit proceeds of the offense. MURRAY is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on March 9, 2018.

The maximum potential sentence in this case is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.

Mr. Kim praised the exceptional work of the Office’s criminal investigators, and thanked the United States Postal Inspection Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission for their assistance.

This case is being handled by the Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. Assistant United States Attorney Robert Allen is in charge of the prosecution.

Original PressReleases…

Financial Fraud: Four Individuals Sentenced For Conspiracy To Commit Bank Fraud And Aggravated Identity Theft

Members of International Bank Fraud Ring Sentenced to Prison for Role in Scheme

TUCSON, Ariz. – Four members of an international fraud syndicate have been sentenced to federal prison for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and aggravated identity theft in connection with their scheme to manufacture and use fraudulent credit cards using the personally identifiable information of US-based individuals.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Blanco of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Acting U.S. Attorney Elizabeth A. Strange for the District of Arizona, and Special Agent in Charge Scott Brown of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI) Phoenix Field Office made the announcement.

“Our office is dedicated to combatting transnational fraud and identity theft,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Strange. “The scope of the fraud scheme in this case was staggering, and we commend our law enforcement partners for apprehending the perpetrators and bringing them to justice.”

“This appalling international scheme illustrates the lengths to which fraudsters will go to game the system for financial gain,” said HSI Special Agent Brown. “We will continue to work tirelessly with our law enforcement partners to hold shameless, brazen fraudsters accountable for their crimes.”

According to admissions made in connection with their guilty pleas, the defendants participated in a conspiracy that bought stolen personally identifiable information, credit card account information, and other financial information over the Internet from individuals located in Ukraine, Tajikistan, and Russia, among other countries. The stolen personally identifiable information and stolen credit card account information were then used to unlawfully manufacture fraudulent credit cards.

Participants in the fraud scheme traveled on multiple occasions from Mexico into the United States and used the fraudulent credit cards to purchase gift cards and high end merchandise, such as iPhones, laptop computers, and designer clothing, from retailers throughout Arizona and elsewhere in the United States. After purchasing merchandise and gift cards, the co-conspirators transported the unlawfully purchased merchandise and gift cards to Mexico for future sale and profit for scheme participants. The defendants admitted in their guilty pleas that they collectively possessed at least 5,684 fraudulent credit cards resulting in the loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The defendants each pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and aggravated identity theft. Today, Rey Martinez-Lopez, 33, of Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, was sentenced to four years and six months in prison, to be followed by five years of supervised release by U.S. District Judge Rosemary Marquez of the District of Arizona.

Judge Marquez sentenced the other three defendants to the following prison terms:

  • On Sept. 29, Anwar Barragan Flores, 39, of Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, was sentenced to seven years in prison, to be followed by five years of supervised release.
  • On Sept. 12, Jorge Williams-Araiza, 38, of Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, was sentenced to three years and two months in prison, to be followed by five years of supervised release.
  • On Aug. 23, Javier Ramirez-Villegas, 36, of Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, was sentenced to four years in prison to be followed by five years of supervised release.
  • The defendants’ restitution will be determined by the Court at a later hearing, which has not been scheduled yet.

The investigation in this case was conducted by HSI Nogales. The prosecution was handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew G. Eltringham, Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force, District of Arizona, Tucson and Trial Attorney Rebecca A. Staton of the Criminal Division’s Organized Crime and Gang Section.

CASE NUMBER: CR-0184-TUC JGZ (LAB)

RELEASE NUMBER: 2017-110_Martinez_Lopez_etal


For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/

Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ (link is external) for the latest news.

Original PressReleases…

Financial Fraud: Patricia Suarez, Manuel R. Fernandez, And Rolando Suarez Charged With Various Offenses In Connection With Bribery Scheme

Former FAA Aviation Safety Inspector and Owners of Miami Aviation Repair Company Charged in Bribery Scheme

A former FAA Aviation Safety Inspector and the co-owner of a South Florida aviation repair company, AVCOM Avionics and Instruments Inc., were charged with various offenses in connection with bribery scheme during 2010-2013. To date, the other co-owner of AVCOM Avionics and Instruments Inc. has also been convicted and sentenced in connection with the ongoing investigation.

Benjamin G. Greenberg, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Marlies T. Gonzalez, Regional Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General (DOT-OIG), and Robert F. Lasky, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, made the announcement.

Patricia Suarez, a/k/a “Patricia Bailly,” a/k/a “Patricia Del Castillo,” 49, of Coral Gables, was charged by indictment with one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 201(b)(1)(C) and (b)(2)(C), and fifteen counts of bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 201(b)(1)(C). If convicted, Patricia Suarez faces a maximum statutory sentence of five years’ imprisonment for the conspiracy count and fifteen years’ imprisonment each for the bribery counts, as well as a fine up to $250,000 or triple the bribery proceeds.

Manuel R. Fernandez, 40, of Miami, was charged by indictment with one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 201(b)(1)(C) and (b)(2)(C); fifteen counts of bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 201(b)(2)(C); one count of providing false statements to a federal agency, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(2); two counts of wire fraud, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; and two counts of aggravated identity theft, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A. If convicted, Fernandez faces a maximum statutory sentence of five years’ imprisonment for the conspiracy count, fifteen years’ imprisonment each for the bribery counts, five years’ imprisonment for the false statements count, twenty years’ imprisonment for each wire fraud count, and a two-year consecutive mandatory minimum sentence for the aggravated identity theft counts, as well as a fine up to $250,000 or triple the bribery proceeds.

Rolando Suarez, 56, of Coral Gables, pled guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 201(b)(1)(C). Rolando Suarez was sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment and a $20,000 fine. Rolando Suarez also agreed to pay approximately $711,940 in joint and several restitution in relation to the bribery scheme.

Acting U.S. Attorney Benjamin G. Greenberg stated, “The Suarez’s, through their company, paid tens of thousands of dollars in bribes to Fernandez, an FAA Aviation Inspector, for the sake of minimizing the cost of doing business, gaining inside information on its competitors, and maximizing profits. This indictment represents our joint efforts to ensure that businesses compete on a level playing field, without improper outside influences or the payment or receipt of bribes.”

“This investigation of alleged bribery demonstrates that those entrusted with ensuring the safety our aviation system are held to the highest standards of integrity in the roles for which they are employed,” said Marlies T. Gonzalez, Regional Special Agent-In-Charge, U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General (DOT OIG). “The Department of Transportation has made safety and accountability a top priority. Working with our law enforcement and prosecutorial partners, we will continue our vigorous efforts to prevent, detect and prosecute fraud schemes that compromise the safety of the traveling public.”

“When those entrusted with aviation system safety put self-interest and personal enrichment ahead of their obligation, they breach the public’s trust,” said Robert F. Lasky, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Miami. “We encourage anyone who may have information about corruption to come forward and report it. This information is vital to our work. The South Florida community can be assured that public corruption will remain a top priority for the FBI.”

According to the indictment, from 2010 through June 28, 2013, Fernandez served as a FAA Aviation Safety Inspector with the FAA South Florida Flight Standards District Office (“FSDO”). Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez were the co-owners, officers, and directors of AVCOM, a Miami aviation repair company, which was subject to the jurisdiction and official responsibility of the FAA South FSDO.

Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez corruptly provided thousands of dollars in cash, income, credit cards, vacation cruises, airline tickets, and other things of value to Fernandez, in exchange for Fernandez violating his lawful and official duties as an FAA Aviation Safety Inspector. In violation of his lawful and official duties, Fernandez provided AVCOM with improperly obtained aviation repair manuals, which saved AVCOM vast sums of money. Fernandez assisted AVCOM in altering and erasing language, warnings, and advisories from the manuals that indicated confidential, proprietary, copyrighted, and trade secret material. Fernandez also provided AVCOM with notice and warnings as to FAA inspections and investigations regarding AVCOM and its competitors, disclosed to AVCOM sensitive and confidential information regarding AVCOM’s competitors, and concealed and failed to report AVCOM legal, regulatory, and policy violations to the FAA.

In addition to cash payments, in order to funnel additional money to Fernandez, Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez submitted documents to AVCOM’s payroll provider establishing Fernandez’s relative as a no-show employee. In turn, Fernandez’s relative promptly provided these AVCOM funds directly to him. Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez also issued various company checks made out directly to Fernandez.

According to the indictment, Fernandez also provided materially false statements to the FAA and DOT in order to hide his AVCOM activities. Additionally, Fernandez electronically submitted fraudulent sick leave requests to the FAA, including utilizing a forged and fictitious doctor’s note.

Mr. Greenberg commended the investigative efforts of the DOT-OIG and the FBI Miami Area Corruption Task Force in this matter. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean T. McLaughlin.

An indictment merely contains allegations and a defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Original PressReleases…

Cyber Crime: EDWARD BUI Pleaded Guilty To Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, And Aggravated Identity Theft

Serial Fraudster Sentenced to 61 Months in Prison for Latest Round of Scams Aimed at Internet and Shipping Businesses

Used Internet Payment Processors for Modern-Day Check Kiting Scheme

A Seattle man sentenced for mail fraud and wire fraud in 2009, changed his name and committed a new round of frauds resulting today in a 61 month federal prison sentence, three years of supervised release and restitution in the amount of $349,164, announced U.S. Attorney Annette L. Hayes. EDWARD BUI, 48, aka Micah Buitron pleaded guilty in August 2017 to mail fraud, wire fraud, and aggravated identity theft. BUI defrauded shipping and internet payment companies of $349,164. U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones noted at the sentencing hearing that he had previously sentenced BUI to two years in prison for his 2009 conviction. At today’s hearing Judge Jones said that Bui “shows complete disregard of the Court, the law and the criminal justice system . . . and callous disregard of damage to businesses and individuals. (He) essentially had the mantra ‘catch me if you can.’”

According to records filed in the case, less than a year after his release from federal custody, BUI began putting pieces of his most recent fraud together. He created a company, Operture, Inc., that was at the center of his mail and wire fraud schemes. BUI created multiple accounts with UPS and online payment processing companies using false names, email addresses, physical addresses and bank accounts. He mailed multiple packages using his UPS accounts to addresses in Nevada and then filed more than 260 claims alleging damage to the packages. He was able to defraud UPS of $31,200.

BUI defrauded online payment processing companies by posing as both the buyer and seller of goods and then claiming refunds. When the payment processor tried to get the ‘refunded’ money back from the supposed seller, the account had been drained leaving the payment processor with a loss. BUI engaged in what is essentially a check kiting scheme using online payment processers. With this scheme he defrauded Google Wallet, Stripe and buy.com of nearly $318,000.

BUI used the identity of a person he knew to conduct some of the fraud. For that conduct, he pled guilty to aggravated identity theft which carries a two year sentence that runs consecutive to any other sentence imposed for the other charges.

BUI used the proceeds of his scheme to invest in real estate in Las Vegas. Some of his investments took advantage of a loophole in Nevada law which allowed him to purchase properties for the outstanding homeowners association payments. In this way BUI was able to buy and flip properties as the real estate market recovered, and ultimately purchased a property worth more than $1 million. The property will be forfeited to the government and its sale will be used to pay off BUI’s victims from this fraud case as well as the fraud case from 2009.

In the 2009 case, BUI fraudulently used the credit card and personal information of more than 60 people and defrauded some 68 businesses. BUI used some 20 aliases to purchase everything from remodeling supplies to expensive home furnishings. BUI used some of the materials to remodel the four properties he owned. Some of the items he resold through his businesses or on other web sites. In all, the fraud or attempted fraud totaled $350,000. BUI also double and triple billed some of his customers for items they purchased from his web site, filed false damage claims with shippers and false claims with his own credit card company.

The case was investigated by the U.S. Secret Service and the Seattle Police Department.

The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Diggs.

Original PressReleases…

Financial Fraud: Lynn Alisa Espejo For Money Laundering And Tax Fraud

Sherwood Woman Sentenced to 45 Months in Prison for Wire Fraud, Money Laundering, and Tax Fraud

LITTLE ROCK—Cody Hiland, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and Tracey D. Montaño, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Special Agent in Charge, announced today that United States District Judge Kristine G. Baker sentenced Lynn Alisa Espejo, 53, of Sherwood, to 45 months in federal prison for her role in a scheme in which she stole more than $600,000 from her employers.

On February 8, 2017, after a seven-day trial, a federal jury found Espejo guilty on 4 counts of filing false tax returns, 15 counts of wire fraud, and 6 counts of money laundering. On Friday, Judge Baker, in addition to the prison time, imposed three years of supervised release and $2,500 in special assessment penalties. Restitution in this type of case is mandatory, and Judge Baker announced that she will determine the amount of restitution Espejo must pay the IRS and issue an order at a later time.

“Today’s sentence reflects the seriousness of Ms. Espejo’s crimes,” Hiland said. “She stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from people who trusted her, and then repeatedly lied about it. These financial and tax-related crimes hurt not just the actual victims Ms. Espejo stole from, but also all citizens who are honest and pay their taxes as they should.”

From 2007-2010, Espejo served as office manager for Practice Management Services, Inc. (PMSI) and Blanford Medical Services, Inc. (BMSI), corporations that administered business expenses for doctors in Little Rock. Espejo was responsible for managing PMSI’s general financial ledger. During her employment, Espejo stole approximately $611,099 by wire transfer from PMSI and BMSI to her personal bank accounts. Espejo misrepresented these transactions in the accounting software Quickbooks and concealed the wire transfers from the doctors and their accountant. Espejo used stolen money for personal expenses such as making payments toward a vehicle, a pool, and construction expenses on a new house.

In addition to the money stolen by wire transfer, Espejo obtained a PMSI debit card and used it for personal purchases from Wal-Mart, including grocery items such as snow crab, bacon, and popcorn balls, video gaming devices, school supplies, and a trampoline.

During this same time period, Espejo filed false tax returns with the IRS in which she failed to report the stolen money as income on her tax returns. These returns resulted in a tax loss of approximately $207,941 for tax years 2007 through 2010.

“Ms. Espejo’s employers entrusted her to ethically and responsibly manage their business’ financial affairs, but instead she decided to divert funds for her personal benefit,” Montaño said. “IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agents are experts in unraveling complex tax fraud and money laundering schemes utilizing our forensic accounting skills. These specialized skills coupled with our partnership with the U.S. Attorney’s Office are key to the identification, investigation, and prosecution of these types of white collar crimes.”

This case was investigated by the IRS Criminal Investigation. Assistant United States Attorneys Stephanie Mazzanti and Jamie Dempsey prosecuted the case for the United States.

Original PressReleases…

Healthcare Fraud: Health Services Management Inc. (HSM) Has Paid The United States To Resolve Claims That The Company Billed Medicaid Programs

Huntsville Nursing Home Pays the United States and the State of Texas $5 Million to Settle Claims Alleging Poor Quality of Care

HOUSTON – Health Services Management Inc. (HSM) has paid the United States $5 million to resolve claims that the company billed the Medicare and Medicaid programs for worthless services and for services that were never provided, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Abe Martinez. HSM is based in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, and owns and operates nursing homes throughout Texas and the United States. The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only with no determination of liability.

The United States and Texas began the investigation following the filing of a qui tam, or whistleblower, lawsuit on Oct. 17, 2014. The whistleblower worked at Huntsville Health Care Center, a 92-bed nursing home and rehabilitation facility that HSM owned and operated. She claimed that during her employment, she witnessed patient abuse and neglect, inadequate care, physical and verbal abuse and denial of basic services, such as providing patients with food and water.

The investigation concluded that from Jan. 1, 2013, through Dec. 31, 2015, Huntsville Health Care Center billed for services that were not provided or which were so substandard and deficient that they were considered worthless and potentially harmful to specific Huntsville patients. The claims for payment to Medicare and Medicaid for those services were deemed to be fraudulent and submitted in violation of federal and state law.

“We take seriously the care of our most vulnerable citizens, the elderly and infirm,” said Martinez. “When providers accept federal funds for reimbursement, they have a duty and responsibility to provide the best care possible to the patient, especially when those patients are elderly and at times incapacitated. The United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) for the Southern District of Texas will aggressively hold those accountable who fail to provide the care that is expected when the failure to do so results in harm to the patients and the treasury.”

“It’s disturbing when a nursing home company accepts Medicare and Medicaid money to care for vulnerable nursing home residents and in return provides substandard care, as alleged in this case,” said Special Agent in Charge C.J. Porter of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Office of Inspector General (DHHS-OIG). “We will continue to hold nursing homes accountable to give residents the quality health services, and living conditions, taxpayers pay them to provide.”

As part of the settlement, HSM also agreed to enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with DHHS-OIG.

Under the False Claims Act and the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act, a private party – known as a relator – can file an action on behalf of the United States and Texas and receive a portion of the recovery. In this case, the relator received $1 million.

The USAO, DHHS-OIG and the Texas Attorney General’s Office – Civil Medicaid Fraud Division conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Jill Venezia handled the matter.

Financial Fraud: ANTON SALJANIN And GJON SALJANIN Plead Guilty To Charges Associated With Participating In a Scheme To Steal

Two Brothers From Yorktown Heights Plead Guilty In Connection With Heist Of Over $1 Million Worth Of Computers Bound For Public High School Students

Joon H. Kim, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that ANTON SALJANIN and GJON SALJANIN plead guilty this week before U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith to charges associated with participating in a scheme to steal, transport, and sell a shipment of approximately 1,200 computers, valued at over $1 million, that were bound for two public high schools in New Jersey. All four defendants charged in the scheme have pled guilty. ANTON SALJANIN and GJON SALJANIN are scheduled to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge Kenneth M. Karas in February 2018.

According to the Complaint and Superseding Indictment filed in White Plains federal court, as well as materials submitted in connection with the plea proceedings:

On or about January 15, 2014, ANTON SALJANIN, a driver for a shipping company, drove a truck from Yorktown Heights, New York, to a technology company located in Massachusetts to pick up a shipment of approximately 1,200 computers. ANTON SALJANIN brought his brother, GJON SALJANIN, with him. The computers were being shipped to two public high schools located in New Jersey, and were valued at over $1 million.

The next morning, ANTON SALJANIN reported to the Yorktown Police Department that the truck had been stolen from a parking lot located in Yorktown Heights. Later that day, ANTON SALJANIN reported to Yorktown Police that he had been driving around looking for the truck when he happened to spot it from the highway in a parking lot in Danbury, Connecticut. The truck would not have been visible in the Danbury parking lot to a driver passing by on the highway. Furthermore, historical cell site data for ANTON SALJANIN’s cellphone contradicts his claims about the route he took to look for the truck.

Yorktown Police detectives examined the truck and found that a window had been broken. The detectives found broken glass on the scene in the Danbury parking lot but found no broken glass on the scene in the Yorktown Heights parking lot, suggesting that the window had been broken at the Danbury parking lot rather than at the Yorktown Heights parking lot.

During interviews with the Yorktown Police, ANTON SALJANIN and GJON SALJANIN both falsely claimed that on the night of January 15, 2014, they drove directly from a convenience store outside of Yorktown Heights to the Yorktown Heights parking lot. Security camera footage from various locations in Yorktown Heights shows that a truck matching the description of the truck driven by the SALJANIN brothers departed from their claimed route, and instead traveled in the direction of the residence of Ujka Vulaj, a long-time friend of ANTON SALJANIN. The video surveillance footage also shows that the duration of the detour corresponds to the approximate length of time it would have taken to drive to Vulaj’s residence, unload the computers from the truck, and return to the route to the Yorktown Heights parking lot.

From in or about January 2014 through at least in or about April 2014, Vulaj sold the stolen computers, some with the help of a co-worker, Carlos Caceres. They sold the computers, which had a retail value of approximately $1,000, for far below the market price. Vulaj and Caceres charged approximately $500 to $800 in cash for each computer, and handed over each computer in plain brown cardboard packaging.


ANTON SALJANIN, 45, of Yorktown Heights, New York, pled guilty on October 18, 2017, to one count of conspiracy to commit theft from an interstate shipment, interstate transportation of stolen property, and receipt, possession, and sale of stolen property, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison; and one count of theft from an interstate shipment, which carries a maximum sentence of ten years in prison. He is scheduled to be sentenced on February 6, 2018.

GJON SALJANIN, 42, of Yorktown Heights, New York, pled guilty on October 16, 2017, to one count of conspiracy to commit theft from an interstate shipment, interstate transportation of stolen property, and receipt, possession, and sale of stolen property, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison. He is scheduled to be sentenced on February 2, 2018.

The SALJANINs’ co-defendants have been convicted and sentenced. Vulaj, 56, of Yorktown Heights, New York, pled guilty on June 17, 2016, to one count of conspiracy to commit theft from an interstate shipment, interstate transportation of stolen property, and receipt, possession, and sale of stolen property, and was sentenced by Judge Karas on May 12, 2017, to 12 months and one day in prison and two years of supervised released (including 6 months of home confinement). Judge Karas also ordered Vulaj to forfeit $889,424.15 in ill-gotten gains and to pay $889,424.15 in restitution.

Caceres, 39, of the Bronx, New York, pled guilty on July 21, 2016, to one count of conspiracy to commit receipt, possession, and sale of stolen property, and was sentenced by Judge Karas on January 6, 2017, to 27 months in prison and three years of supervised released. Judge Karas also ordered Caceres to forfeit $331,188 in ill-gotten gains and to pay $331,188 in restitution.

Mr. Kim praised the outstanding investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Yorktown Police Department, the Westchester County Police Department, and the New York City Police Department. He also thanked the Bronx County District Attorney’s Office for its assistance.

This case is being handled by the Office’s White Plains Division. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Won S. Shin, Benjamin Allee, and Scott Hartman are in charge of the prosecution.

Original PressReleases…

Financial Fraud: Group Of Eleven Individuals, Charged For Their Roles In a Scheme That Used Stolen Identities to Order Smartphones And Other Electronic Goods

Eleven Men Charged In $1 Million Cross-Country Scheme To Defraud National Cellular Provider

NEWARK, N.J. – Eleven men in New York, Connecticut, North Carolina and Florida were charged today for their roles in a scheme that used stolen identities to order smartphones and other electronic goods and then paid drivers with a parcel delivery company to divert those goods to members of the conspiracy, Acting U.S. Attorney William E. Fitzpatrick announced.

Eight defendants were arrested this morning. Arrantes Garrincha Green, a/k/a “Don Gucci,” a/k/a “Gucci,” 39, of Margate, Florida, and Helton Arando Mallette, 27, of Miami, Florida, will appear this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres in Miami federal court. Omar Kimani Forsythe, a/k/a “Biggs,” 26, and Elvis Anthony Prehay, 43, both of Tamarac, Florida, will appear before Judge Torres tomorrow.

Sheldon Andre Wellington, a/k/a “Shellinz,” 35, of Rockville Center, New York, and Kindley Michel, 36, of Spring Valley, New York, will appear this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson in Newark federal court.

Troy Linton Cooper, 35, of East Hartford, Connecticut, will appear this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert Richardson in Hartford federal court. Dashawn Brown, 25, of Raleigh, North Carolina, will appear this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge James E. Gates in Raleigh federal court.

Andre Donovan Duffas, 27, of Plantation, Florida, Jermaine Wilson, a/k/a “Budds,” 32, of Nanuet, New York, and Oneil Gentles, a/k/a “Daffy,” 40, of Bronx, New York, remain at large.

All 11 defendants are charged by indictment with one count of wire fraud conspiracy and one count of conspiracy to transport stolen goods in interstate commerce. Green is also charged with one count of aggravated identity theft.

According to the indictment:

From June 2015 through June 2017, the defendants and others, led by Green, allegedly conspired to steal electronic equipment, including new smartphones, from a national cellular service provider.

Members of the conspiracy used stolen personal identifiers and debit and credit card information to place orders with the victim company. Many of the orders were allegedly made using two cellular phones associated with Green.

Afterwards, members of the conspiracy, including Green, Duffas, Mallette, Prehay, Wellington, and Wilson, transmitted anticipated delivery dates and locations of the fraudulently-ordered products to other conspirators who were employed as drivers with a major parcel delivery company. These drivers, including Brown, Cooper and Michel, were paid to divert the products mid-delivery to other members of the conspiracy, including Duffas, Forsythe, Gentles, Mallette, Prehay, Wellington, and Wilson.

Proceeds generated through the scheme were shared by wire transfer or depositing the funds in designated bank accounts.

The scheme compromised the identities of hundreds of residents in multiple municipalities across multiple states, including Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, and caused losses in excess of $1 million to the victim company.

The count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud carries a maximum potential penalty of 20 years in prison. The count of conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen property carries a maximum potential penalty of five years in prison. Both counts carry a potential fine of $250,000, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense. The aggravated identity theft count carries a mandatory sentence of two years in prison, which must be served in addition to any sentence imposed.

Acting U.S. Attorney Fitzpatrick credited special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Timothy Gallagher in Newark, with the investigation leading to the charges. He also thanked the Upper Saddle River Police Department, the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, the NYPD, the Westchester County District Attorney’s Office, the West Hartford Police Department and the Connecticut State’s Attorney’s Office, Hartford Judicial District, for their assistance.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Sammi Malek of the U.S. Attorney’s Office General Crimes Unit in Newark.

Original PressReleases…

Financial Fraud: David Dae Sok Son Pleaded Guilty To An Information Charging Him With Conspiracy, Bribery, And Obstruction Of Justice

Prince George’s County Liquor Board Official Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy, Bribery, and Obstruction of Justice

Greenbelt, Maryland – On October 17, 2017, Prince George’s County Liquor Board official David Dae Sok Son, age 41, of Bowie, Maryland, pleaded guilty to an Information charging him with conspiracy, bribery, and obstruction of justice, in a scheme involving alcoholic beverage licenses in Prince George’s County, Maryland.

The guilty plea was announced by Acting United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Stephen M. Schenning; Special Agent in Charge Gordon B. Johnson of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Baltimore Field Office; Special Agent in Charge Thomas Jankowski of the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation, Washington, D.C. Field Office; and Chief Henry Stawinski III of the Prince George’s County Police Department.

Son was a Commissioner on the Prince George’s County Board of License Commissioners (“Liquor Board”) from 2005 through 2014. During the 2015 Maryland legislative session, Son served as a liaison for the Prince George’s County Senate delegation. He returned to the Liquor Board later in 2015, as its Director.

As described in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal complaint and in the plea agreement, Son solicited and facilitated bribes, from lobbyists and business owners, including co-conspirators Young Jung Paig and Shin Ja Lee. The bribe recipients were elected state officials, including then-County Councilman William Alberto Campos-Escobar (a/k/a “Will Campos”) and then-Delegate Michael Vaughn.

For example, during a meeting on April 4, 2014, Son informed an FBI Confidential Human Source (“CHS”) that Campos needed $10,000 to pay an expense related to Campos’s campaign for Maryland State Delegate. Son told the CHS that Son had spoken with Campos about the CHS giving cash to Campos in exchange for Campos arranging for another grant to be awarded to a non-profit organization selected by the CHS.

On or about April 9, 2014, Son met the CHS at a coffee shop in Lanham, Maryland. Son told the CHS that Son had told Campos to “hook [the CHS] up” with the developer of a new business in the County, so that the developer would retain the CHS’s business services. Son explained to the CHS that the business owed Campos, because Campos obtained a tax benefit for the business. Son and the CHS then walked to the coffee shop’s parking lot, where the CHS’s vehicle was located. The CHS then retrieved $3,000 in U.S. currency from the CHS’s vehicle.

On or about April 9, 2014, Son gave Campos the $3,000 in U.S. currency that Son had received from the CHS. Later on April 9, 2014, Campos sent a text message to the CHS that stated, “I owe you big time my man.”

Beginning in 2015, Son solicited and facilitated bribe payments from lobbyists and business owners who were interested in the “Sunday Sales Bill,” which established up to 100 Sunday liquor sales permits in Prince George’s County. The bribes were intended to influence public officials in the performance of their official duties. For example, in 2015, Son had asked Campos to assist in passing the Sunday Sales bill by talking to one of his colleagues about the bill; both subsequently voted in favor of the bill. On April 22, 2015, after the passage of the bill, Son arranged a lunch between Campos, Paig, and Lee. A lobbyist and attorney, Matthew Gorman, also attended. During the lunch, Son told Campos to meet Paig in the men’s bathroom, saying that Paig was “… going to hook you up.” In the men’s bathroom, Paig handed Campos an envelope containing a total of $4,000 cash, which constituted a bribe from Son, Paig, Lee, and Gorman. In addition, on October 19, 2015, Son received a $4,000 bribe payment from a lobbyist for his assistance in ensuring that the lobbyist’s clients received Sunday Sales licenses.

Lee and Paig subsequently talked to Son about getting beneficial legislation introduced related to the Sunday Sales bill and indicated that they would be willing to pay $50,000 to make that happen. Son spoke with Delegate Vaughn, who agreed to introduce legislation. On November 10, 2015, Son arranged for Paig and Lee to meet with Vaughn so they could make a “down payment.” After the meeting, law enforcement observed Paig and Vaughn get into Vaughn’s car, while Lee and Son waited in the parking lot. Shortly after Paig got out of the car, Vaughn drove directly to a bank in the same shopping center. Bank surveillance video shows Vaughn pulling a stack of cash out of his right pocket and handing it to the teller, and then doing the same from his left pocket. Bank records show that Vaughn deposited a total of $4,000.

On December 17, 2016, after Son had been questioned by the FBI, he hand-wrote a letter to another subject of the FBI’s investigation informing the subject that Son had been “taken” by the “Feds” and was “wired” when he last visited the subject. In the letter, Son also listed names of individuals who had “flipped,” or cooperated with the FBI. Son further described devices used by the FBI for body wires and told the subject that the subject should assume meetings with Son were being recorded. Son also laid out means by which the subject and Son could communicate secretly.

If convicted, Son faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison for the conspiracy, ten years in prison for bribery, and 20 years in prison for obstruction of justice. U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has scheduled sentencing for January 22, 2018 at 10 a.m. in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt.

Acting United States Attorney Stephen M. Schenning commended the FBI, IRS-CI, and Prince George’s County Police Department for their work in the investigation. Mr. Schenning thanked Assistant U.S. Attorneys Thomas P. Windom, Menaka Kalaskar, Arun G. Rao, and James A. Crowell IV, who prosecuted the case.

Original PressReleases…

Mortgage Fraud: Group Of 4 Individuals Charged With Using – Straw Buyers – To Fraudulently Obtain Mortgage Loans From a Bank

Four People Charged In Mortgage Fraud Conspiracy

NEWARK, N.J. – A real estate investor, a builder, a mortgage loan officer, and a real estate settlement attorney were arrested today and charged with using “straw buyers” to fraudulently obtain mortgage loans from a bank, Acting U.S. Attorney William E. Fitzpatrick announced.

Victor Santos, a/k/a “Vitor Santos,” 57, of Wachtung, New Jersey; Arsenio Santos, a/k/a “Gaspar Santos,” 50, of Warren, New Jersey; Fausto Simoes, 64, of Millington, New Jersey; and, Raquel Casalinho, 37, of Union, New Jersey, are charged by complaint with one count each of conspiracy to commit bank fraud. They are expected to appear at 2 p.m. today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson in Newark federal court.

According to the complaint:

From September 2007 through November 2008, Victor Santos, a real estate investor; Arsenio Santos, a builder and Victor’s cousin; Casalinho, a junior home mortgage consultant at the victim bank and Victor’s niece; and Simoes, a real estate settlement attorney, and others allegedly conspired to fraudulently obtain mortgage loans with a total value of more than $5 million.

Victor Santos, Arsenio Santos, and their conspirators allegedly recruited straw buyers to purchase properties in Newark and obtained their identifying information, including Social Security cards and drivers’ licenses. A “straw buyer” was an individual who purchased a property for another in order to conceal the identity of the actual purchaser, usually in exchange for a fee.

In exchange for the use of the straw buyers’ identity and credit history, Victor Santos, Arsenio Santos, and others allegedly agreed to pay each of the straw buyers a fee of approximately $5,000, provide the straw buyer’s down payment and cash required for closing, secure tenants to lease the purchased property and make the mortgage payments on each of the fraudulently obtained mortgages. These secret agreements were not disclosed to the bank.

In accordance with Victor Santos’ instructions, the straw buyers’ information was provided to Casalinho and was used to prepare fraudulent mortgage loan applications that contained a variety of false statements, including the identity of the actual buyer. For the two representative schemes highlighted in the complaint, Casalinho, Victor Santos, Arsenio Santos, and their conspirators prepared and submitted mortgage applications containing false information to the bank and obtained loans totaling more than $900,000. The conspirators allegedly arranged transactions for the Newark properties whereby the straw buyers would nominally purchase the properties for far more than the sellers had agreed to sell them, and the conspirators kept the difference between the contract price and the amounts the sellers received.

Simoes was the closing attorney on approximately 10 of the fraudulent transactions and signed and certified as true the final settlement statements. These statements falsely stated that the cash required for closing for each transaction came from the straw buyer. In fact, Victor Santos and his conspirators provided those funds to Simoes and the funds were deposited into Simoes’ attorney trust account. For certain transactions, a shell company – whose bank account was controlled by Victor Santos and a conspirator and to which funds from fraudulently obtained mortgage loans were disbursed – was the source of the cashier’s checks given to Simoes to fund the buyer’s cash required at closing. For other transactions, down payments came from an account owned and controlled by Arsenio Santos and Victor Santos, the proceeds of the mortgage loan itself after funding or closing, or from the proceeds of a previously obtained fraudulent loan.

The conspiracy to commit bank fraud carries a maximum potential penalty of 30 years in prison, a fine of $1 million or twice the gross gain to the defendants or twice the gross loss to others whichever is greater.

Acting U.S. Attorney Fitzpatrick credited special agents of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Steven Perez, and special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Timothy Gallagher of the Newark office, with the investigation leading to today’s charges.

The government is represented by Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kevin DiGregory and Charlie Divine and Senior Litigation Counsel Andrew Leven of the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s Economic Crimes Unit in Newark.

The charges and allegations contained in the complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Original PressReleases…

Marriage Fraud: Jamar Thomas Was Sentenced of Conspiracy to Encourage or Induce an Alien For Private or Commercial Gain to Reside in The United States

Ring Leader Sentenced In Marriage Fraud Scheme

ROCHESTER, N.Y. – Acting U.S. Attorney James P. Kennedy, Jr. announced today that Jamar Thomas, 30, of Rochester, NY, who was convicted of conspiracy to encourage or induce an alien for private or commercial gain to reside in the United States in violation of law, was sentenced to one year in prison by U.S. District Judge David G. Larimer.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig R. Gestring, who is handling the case, stated that in October 2015, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) received information from a confidential informant regarding an ongoing marriage fraud scheme involving Jamar Thomas and United States citizen (USC) females, based in Rochester.

Subsequent investigation determined that the defendant told a Confidential Informant, who was not a United States citizen, but a native and citizen of Nigeria, that he could arrange fraudulent marriages between non-citizen males and United States citizen females known to him. Thomas said non-citizen males could pay $5,000 to marry his female co¬conspirators in order to gain legal status in the United States.

Between November 2015, and September 2016, the defendant met with undercover federal agents and/or confidential informants in Rochester to discuss their sham marriage. Thomas introduced the undercover agents or confidential informants to his co-conspirators and they provided their name, address, date of birth, and telephone numbers so that the undercover agents or confidential informants could file the necessary immigration forms.

During these meetings, the defendant and the undercover agents or confidential informants discussed specific details of the sham marriage process and the ceremony. On at least two occasions, women working for Thomas got married at a Town Clerk’s Office within the Western District of New York. On one occasion, the defendant was physically present and acted as a “witness” to one such wedding. However, unknown to Thomas, the Town Clerk who performed the ceremonies was actually an undercover law enforcement agent. Following the weddings, false immigration forms were prepared and mailed in support of applications to adjust the citizenship status of the new “spouses.”

On at least one occasion, women working for the defendant accompanied the undercover agent to Buffalo and participated in an immigration interview with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.

The undercover agents or confidential informants paid money directly to Thomas and his female co-conspirators for their roles in the sham marriages.

Also charged and convicted in this case:

• Khaaliqa Kegler-sentenced to three years probation to include six months home confinement;
• Chimere Brooks-sentenced to two years probation; and
• Nadia Thomas-awaiting sentencing.

“Fittingly, defendant Thomas was sentenced on the same day and in the same federal courthouse in which over 50 individuals participated in a naturalization ceremony during which they became lawful U.S. citizens,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Kennedy. “The folks who participated in that Naturalization ceremony followed the rule of law and, in so doing, demonstrated a basic understanding of and respect for the fundamental idea that in America, with rights come responsibilities. By acting responsibly and following the rules, those individuals commendably walked out of the courthouse that day with all of the rights and privileges that come with citizenship to the United States. These fraudsters, on the other hand, who sought to circumvent the rule of law and essentially to sell the privilege of citizenship to our great Nation to the highest bidder, also left the courthouse with exactly what they deserved—federal criminal convictions and sentences which include terms of probation or imprisonment.”

“Marriage fraud undermines our nation’s legitimate immigration system and creates a potential vulnerability for law-abiding citizens,” said Kevin Kelly, Special Agent-in- Charge of HSI Buffalo. “Anyone who engages in marriage fraud is taking an illegal shortcut to U.S. citizenship. HSI will continue to aggressively investigate this type of criminal activity.”

The convictions in this case are the result of an investigation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations, Child Exploitation Unit, under the direction of Special Agent-in-Charge Kevin Kelly.

Banking Fraud: Ways of Cheating And Stealing Banking

As a customer you will be seen as a capacity goal for fraudulent activities. however via arming yourself with statistics and tools you could shield your self from becoming a sufferer of fraud.

Do you know the 4 largest fraud threats you face?

  • digital fraud
  • identity theft
  • credit/debit card fraud
  • cheque fraud.

Credit/Debit Card Fraud

credit score card and debit card fraud is against the law whereby your credit or debit card can be reproduced with a purpose to use the credit score stability to acquire a economic benefit. the advent and/or alteration of a credit/debit card happens whilst the records contained on the magnetic strip is reproduced. this kind of crime is called ‘skimming’.

credit or debit card fraud also can arise whilst your card is lost or stolen and utilized by a 3rd celebration to purchase items with the ones playing cards or to cast off coins from the cards.

credit score or debit playing cards can also be intercepted in transit while being despatched to you. your cards can also be compromised by using a bent merchant who undertakes unauthorised duplicate transactions to your card.

Protect your credit / debit card:

  • memorise your private identity range (pin). do not use the equal pin for all of your cards, and don’t select your beginning date or different easily identifiable numbers that is probably on something else to your wallet.
  • take a look at statements and speak to your credit card issuer without delay in case you see some thing suspicious on your bill. you could assist the corporation discover fraud—and shop your self from paying unauthorised charges.
  • do now not permit your credit card out of your sight at whenever – for instance, at a restaurant – go together with the card.
  • card fraud isn’t applicable in australia handiest – be just as vigilant whilst travelling foreign places, credit card skimming is an global crime.
  • continually sign your card in ink as quickly as you acquire it.
  • hold music of when new and reissued cards must arrive, and speak to the credit score card provider if they don’t come on time.
  • make certain your mailbox is secure, and that simplest you and the postal provider have get right of entry to to it.
  • tear up all credit score card receipts and pre-permitted credit score card offers into small pieces before you throw them away. hold your billing statements in a safe vicinity.
  • when you operate your credit score card on line, ensure you’re using a comfortable internet site. look for a small key or lock symbol at the lowest right of your browser window.
  • never supply your card quantity to strangers or telemarketers who call you at the cellphone. do not provide your card number until you initiated the decision.

Cheque Fraud

What’s cheque fraud?

Cheque fraud is using a cheque to get economic benefit by using:

  • changing the cheque (payee/amount) with out authority
  • theft of legitimate cheques after which altering them
  • duplication or counterfeiting of cheques
  • the usage of false invoices to get legitimate cheques
  • depositing a cheque into a 3rd birthday party account without authority
  • depositing a cheque for charge knowing that insufficient budget are within the account to cover the deposited cheque.

The way to protect yourself from cheque fraud

  • reconcile your debts right away and frequently
  • by no means sign blank cheques, and only sign cheques after all information were finished.
  • restrict the range of signatures to your account to ensure manipulate.
  • ensure that your signature isn’t with documents that can be accessed by the majority.
  • keep all cheques comfy while no longer in use to deter theft.
  • don’t go away any gaps inside the of entirety of the payee call, quantity in phrases and in figures.
  • if cheques are lost or stolen touch anz immediately and ask them to forestall price at the cheque.
  • ensure that any invoices are valid before charge.
  • recollect the usage of electronic means of payment (if possible) for high fee payments.
  • make sure that your mailbox is comfy to shield your inward cheques.

Electronic Fraud

E-mail scams and fake web sites

some of clients from australian economic institutions have been focused with hoax emails. these emails appear like genuine bank emails.

a few emails tell the purchaser that their security info and passwords need to be updated through logging into an authentic searching, however fake website. the reason of these websites is to attain your go browsing details to get admission to your bank debts.

others talk safety messages and suggest you to install software from the e-mail that tests and eliminates viruses. by way of downloading the software you are in reality tricked into downloading a virus.

anz will not send you an email asking for your account details, monetary information, or login details for anz phone banking, anz mobile banking or anz net banking.

Identity Theft

identity robbery is where your personal information are acquired to get some type of economic or other benefit, leaving you the proprietor of that identification regularly in huge debt with a poor credit score history and in a few instances with criminal implications.

your information can be obtained in lots of methods:

  • theft, including theft of mail from your mailbox at home
  • by using going thru your rubbish packing containers
  • telephone, fax and mail scams
  • internet.

the following can be used to anticipate your identification:

  • date of birth
  • utilities bills (telephone, gasoline, water and charges notices)
  • cope with.

Protecting You From Scams, Online and Off.

Exit mobile version