Tax Fraud: DAVID ADAMS Charged With One Count of Tax Evasion And One Count of Filing a False Tax Return

FraudsWatch.com

<h2>Old Saybrook Resident Charged with Additional Tax Crimes<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p>Deirdre M&period; Daly&comma; United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut&comma; and Joel P&period; Garland&comma; Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation in New England&comma; today announced that a federal grand jury in New Haven has returned a six-count superseding indictment charging DAVID ADAMS&comma; 56&comma; of Old Saybrook&comma; with additional tax offenses&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>On May 3&comma; 2016&comma; the grand jury returned an indictment charging ADAMS with one count of tax evasion and one count of filing a false tax return for the 2011 tax year&period;  The superseding indictment&comma; which was returned yesterday&comma; charges ADAMS with filing a false tax return for the 2009 tax year&comma; filing a false tax return and tax evasion for the 2011 tax year&comma; filing a false tax return and tax evasion for the 2012 tax year&comma; and attempting to interfere with the administration of the tax laws&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As alleged in the superseding indictment&comma; in the early 1980s&comma; and then continuing from 1996 onward&comma; ADAMS was substantially delinquent in filing his tax returns and paying amounts owed to the IRS&period;  Starting at least as early as 1998&comma; ADAMS repeatedly engaged with IRS collections officers tasked with trying to get ADAMS into compliance with the tax laws&period;  Although he was repeatedly advised by IRS collections officers about his obligations to pay estimated taxes&comma; ADAMS continually failed to pay those taxes on time or in sufficient amounts&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The indictment further alleges that ADAMS sold an online floral business in 2002&comma; which accounted for a significant portion of &dollar;6&comma;269&comma;960 in taxable income he claimed on his 2002 tax return&period;  Although ADAMS represented to the IRS in August 2003 that he was enclosing payment of &dollar;1&comma;250&comma;000&comma; no such payment was enclosed and ADAMS never made the payment&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It is further alleged that ADAMS engaged the services of a certified public accountant to prepare his personal tax returns beginning in approximately 1993&comma; and then repeatedly failed to give the accountant complete&comma; accurate information&period;  For example&comma; for the 2009 tax year&comma; ADAMS told his accountant that he had made &dollar;550&comma;000 in estimated tax payments when&comma; in fact&comma; ADAMS knew he had only paid &dollar;425&comma;000&period;  Similarly&comma; in 2011&comma; ADAMS told his accountant that he had made &dollar;220&comma;000 in estimated tax payments&comma; but knew that he had only made &dollar;100&comma;000&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The indictment further alleges that&comma; in June 2011&comma; ADAMS sold his partnership interest in another online floral business and received &dollar;4&comma;708&comma;419&period;20 wired into his personal bank account as part of the net proceeds owed to him as a result of the sale&period;  Although he knew that he owed substantial taxes on that amount&comma; ADAMS engaged in a number of affirmative acts to conceal and attempt to conceal this income in order to evade the assessment of a tax including&colon;  &lpar;1&rpar; failing to tell his accountant about the &dollar;4&comma;708&comma;419&period;20 in income ADAMS received in 2011&semi; &lpar;2&rpar; providing the accountant with false information about ADAMS’s estimated tax payments for the year&comma; telling the accountant that he had paid &dollar;220&comma;000 when in fact&comma; ADAMS knew he had only paid &dollar;100&comma;000 in estimated taxes for 2011&semi; &lpar;3&rpar; causing the accountant to prepare his 2011 tax return with false and fraudulent information&semi; and &lpar;4&rpar; representing to an IRS revenue officer who was responsible for collecting ADAMS’s delinquent tax payments and securing ADAMS’s overdue tax returns&comma; that he had hoped to have funds to pay down his back tax liability &lpar;including tax liability associated with the 2002 sale&rpar;&comma; but that nothing had been &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;panning out&period;”  ADAMS failed to disclose to the revenue officer that he had received &dollar;4&comma;708&comma;419&period;20 in cash less than three weeks earlier&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It is alleged that&comma; in June 2012&comma; ADAMS received an additional &dollar;1&comma;320&comma;609&period;59 into his personal bank account as net proceeds of the 2011 sale&period;  Although he knew that he owed substantial taxes on that amount&comma; ADAMS failed to disclose the income to his accountant&comma; and failed to declare it on his tax return for that year&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As further alleged in the superseding indictment&comma; ADAMS engaged in a more than 16-year effort to inhibit the IRS’s efforts to collect back taxes from him&period;  Among other things&comma; ADAMS bounced checks to the IRS&semi; told IRS collections officers that payment had been sent when it had not&semi; promised to pay delinquent tax liabilities in full and then delayed payment&comma; made only partial payment&comma; failed to pay at all&comma; or paid off one liability while leaving another liability unpaid&semi; claimed that he lacked funds to pay his delinquent tax but failed to disclose that he had access to enough cash to fully pay back his tax liabilities&semi; filed false and fraudulent returns with the IRS&semi; overstated the amounts of estimated taxes paid to the IRS&comma; and failed to declare more than &dollar;6 million in income to the IRS&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The indictment charges ADAMS with two counts of tax evasion&comma; three counts of making and subscribing a false tax return&comma; and one count of attempting to interfere with the administration of the IRS laws&period;  Each tax evasion offense carries a maximum term of imprisonment of five years&comma; each count of filing a false tax return carries a maximum term of imprisonment three years&comma; and the interference charge carries a maximum term of imprisonment of three years&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>ADAMS was arrested on a federal criminal complaint on April 14&comma; 2016&comma; and is released on a &dollar;500&comma;000 bond secured by real property&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As of May 2016&comma; ADAMS owed approximately &dollar;4&period;6 million in back taxes&comma; interest and penalties for tax years 2002&comma; 2006&comma; 2007&comma; 2008&comma; 2009&comma; 2011&comma; and 2012&period;  Interest and penalties have continued to accrue since that time&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>U&period;S&period; Attorney Daly stressed that an indictment is not evidence of guilt&period;  Charges are only allegations and a defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>This matter has been investigated by the Internal Revenue Service&comma; Criminal Investigation Division&period;  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U&period;S&period; Attorney Susan L&period; Wines&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;justice&period;gov&sol;usao-ct&sol;pr&sol;old-saybrook-resident-charged-additional-tax-crimes">Original PressReleases&&num;8230&semi;<&sol;a><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Share This Article
Follow:
FraudsWatch is а site reporting on fraud and scammers on internet, in financial services and personal. Providing a daily news service publishes articles contributed by experts; is widely reported in thе latest compliance requirements, and offers very broad coverage of thе latest online theft cases, pending investigations and threats of fraud.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version