Financial Fraud: DAVID HANSON And CLIFFORD KEEN Pleaded Guilty To Conspiracy To Commit Honest Services Wire Fraud And Soliciting a Bribe

<h2>Two Former St&period; Tammany Parish Sheriff’s Deputies Plead Guilty for their Roles in Kickback and Bribery Scheme Involving Contract for Privatization of Work Release Program in St&period; Tammany Parish<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p>NEW ORLEANS – U&period;S&period; Attorney Peter G&period; Strasser announced that DAVID HANSON&comma; age 61&comma; from Abita Springs&comma; Louisiana&comma; and CLIFFORD &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;SKIP” KEEN&comma; age 50&comma; from Covington&comma; Louisiana&comma; pleaded guilty Wednesday&comma; February 27&comma; 2019 before United States District Judge Ivan L&period;R&period; Lemelle to conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud and soliciting a bribe&comma; in violation of 18 U&period;S&period;C&period; &&num;8221&semi; 371&comma; 1343&comma; 1346&comma; and 666&lpar;a&rpar;&lpar;1&rpar;&lpar;B&rpar;&comma; for their roles in the privatization of a work release program in Slidell&comma; Louisiana that operated between 2013 and 2016&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<div class&equals;"mh-content-ad"><script async src&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;pagead2&period;googlesyndication&period;com&sol;pagead&sol;js&sol;adsbygoogle&period;js&quest;client&equals;ca-pub-9162800720558968"&NewLine; crossorigin&equals;"anonymous"><&sol;script>&NewLine;<ins class&equals;"adsbygoogle"&NewLine; style&equals;"display&colon;block&semi; text-align&colon;center&semi;"&NewLine; data-ad-layout&equals;"in-article"&NewLine; data-ad-format&equals;"fluid"&NewLine; data-ad-client&equals;"ca-pub-9162800720558968"&NewLine; data-ad-slot&equals;"1081854981"><&sol;ins>&NewLine;<script>&NewLine; &lpar;adsbygoogle &equals; window&period;adsbygoogle &vert;&vert; &lbrack;&rsqb;&rpar;&period;push&lpar;&lbrace;&rcub;&rpar;&semi;&NewLine;<&sol;script><&sol;div>&NewLine;<p>According to court documents&comma; HANSON and KEEN&comma; each of whom worked most recently as Captains with the St&period; Tammany Parish Sheriff’s Office &lpar;STPSO&rpar; discussed with the then-Sheriff &lpar;&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Public Official 1”&rpar; about becoming owners of a work release program in Slidell&comma; Louisiana that Public Official 1 decided to privatize&period; The Sheriff of STPSO had authority&comma; among other things&comma; to enter into certain contracts binding STPSO&comma; including professional service contracts&comma; unilaterally&period; Because STPSO rules prohibited employees from &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;participating in a transaction in which he has a personal substantial economic interest of which he may be reasonably expected to know involving the governmental entity&comma;” HANSON and KEEN would have had to resign from STPSO—thereby losing their salaries and future pension increases—if they wanted to assume ownership and control of the Slidell work release program&period; HANSON&comma; KEEN&comma; and Public Official 1 discussed ways to allow HANSON and KEEN to maintain their employment and still profit from the Slidell work release program&period; Ultimately&comma; HANSON&comma; KEEN&comma; and Public Official 1 agreed to make KEEN’s adult son &lpar;Person 1&rpar; and HANSON’s adult daughter &lpar;Person 2&rpar; owners of the Slidell work release program&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>HANSON&comma; KEEN&comma; and Public Official 1 agreed that they needed to find another individual actually to operate the Slidell work release program because Person 1 and Person 2 lacked sufficient education&comma; training&comma; experience&comma; or funding&period; They decided on Person 3&comma; to whom HANSON presented a series of conditions&comma; including the following&colon; Person 1 and Person 2 would each own forty-five &lpar;45&rpar; percent of the Slidell work release program and would each receive forty-five &lpar;45&rpar; percent of the profits&comma; while Person 3 would own ten &lpar;10&rpar; percent&comma; receive ten &lpar;10&rpar; percent of the profits&comma; and receive a salary&semi; and Person 3 would be responsible for the daily operations of the Slidell work release program&period; Person 3 was also responsible for providing the capital necessary to initiate the program&period; On about May 1&comma; 2013&comma; Person 1&comma; Person 2&comma; and Person 3 entered into an operating agreement that created St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions&comma; LLC&comma; in which Person 1 and Person 2 each had a forty-five percent ownership interest and Person 3 had only a ten percent ownership interest&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>On June 4&comma; 2013&comma; Public Official 1 entered into a cooperative endeavor agreement &lpar;&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;privatization agreement”&rpar; on behalf of STPSO with St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions&comma; LLC to operate the Slidell work release program&period; Although Person 1 and Person 2 acted effectively as passive members and did not participate substantially in the operation&comma; oversight&comma; or administration of the Slidell work release program&comma; Person 3 was required to pay Person 1 and Person 2 salaries in addition to their ownership disbursements&period; Person 3 was also directed to pay Person 4&comma; who was Public Official 1’s relative and an employee at STPSO&comma; approximately &dollar;30&comma;000 per year for a no-show job at the Slidell work release program&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>During the time St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions&comma; LLC operated the Slidell work release program&comma; Person 1 and Person 2 received not less than &dollar;1&comma;195&comma;000 from St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions&comma; LLC in the form of ownership disbursements&comma; salary payments&comma; and occasional lump sum miscellaneous payments&period; Person 1 received no fewer than 145 payments totaling over &dollar;550&comma;000&comma; and Person 2 received no fewer than 131 payments totaling over &dollar;600&comma;000&period; Person 1 and Person 2 converted the majority of the money they received from St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions&comma; LLC to cash&period; At the request of KEEN and HANSON&comma; Persons 1 and 2 then transferred a significant portion of the funds back to their fathers&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Additionally&comma; HANSON&comma; KEEN&comma; and Public Official 1 understood that Public Official 1 would receive <a class&equals;"wpil&lowbar;keyword&lowbar;link" href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;fraudswatch&period;com&sol;tag&sol;financial-fraud&sol;amp&sol;" title&equals;"financial" data-wpil-keyword-link&equals;"linked" data-wpil-monitor-id&equals;"910">financial<&sol;a> compensation from them in exchange for bestowing the right to operate the Slidell work release program on St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions&comma; LLC&period; HANSON and KEEN each gave Public Official 1 a portion of the payments they received from St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions LLC&comma; through Person 1 and Person 2&comma; in cash payoffs in amounts greater than &dollar;1&comma;000 on a recurring basis in exchange for Public Official 1 bestowing the right to operate the Slidell work release program on St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions LLC&period; HANSON also arranged for Public Official 1’s son to receive a check in the amount of &dollar;4&comma;000 because Public Official 1 gave the contract to operate the Slidell work release program to St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions&comma; LLC&period; HANSON&comma; KEEN&comma; Public Official 1&comma; and others attempted to conceal the scheme by&comma; among other things&comma; not including in the privatization agreement the fact that Public Official 1 would receive financial compensation in exchange for bestowing the right to operate the Slidell work release program on St&period; Tammany Workforce Solutions LLC&comma; communicating by cellular telephone&comma; and providing most of the money to Public Official 1 in the form of cash&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>HANSON and KEEN each face a maximum term of imprisonment of five years&comma; a fine of up to &dollar;250&comma;000&period;00&comma; three years supervised release after imprisonment&comma; and a mandatory &dollar;100 special assessment&period; Sentencing before Judge Lemelle has been scheduled for May 29&comma; 2019&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>U&period;S&period; Attorney Strasser praised the work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation Division and thanks the Metropolitan Crime Commission for its assistance&period; Assistant United States Attorneys Jordan Ginsberg&comma; Supervisor of the Public Corruption Unit&comma; and Elizabeth Privitera&comma; Supervisor of the Violent Crime Unit&comma; are in charge of the prosecution&period;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Financial FraudPublic Corruption