<h2>Novo Nordisk Agrees to Pay $58 Million For Failure to Comply With FDA-Mandated Risk Program</h2>
<p><strong>Payments Resolve Allegations Highlighted in DOJ Civil Complaint And Recently Unsealed Whistleblower Actions</strong></p>
<p>WASHINGTON – Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Novo Nordisk Inc. will pay $58.65 million to resolve allegations that the company failed to comply with the FDA-mandated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for its Type II diabetes medication Victoza, the Justice Department announced today. The resolution includes disgorgement of $12.15 million for alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) from 2010 to 2012 and a payment of $46.5 million for alleged violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) from 2010 to 2014. Novo Nordisk is a subsidiary of Novo Nordisk U.S. Holdings Inc., which is a subsidiary of Novo Nordisk A/S of Denmark. Novo Nordisk’s U.S. headquarters is in Plainsboro, New Jersey.</p>
<p>“Today’s resolution demonstrates the Department of Justice’s continued commitment to ensuring that drug manufacturers comply with the law,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad A. Readler of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “When a drug manufacturer fails to share accurate risk information with doctors and patients, it deprives physicians of information vital to medical decision-making.”</p>
<p>“Novo Nordisk’s actions unnecessarily put vulnerable patients at risk,” said U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips for the District of Columbia. “We are committed to holding companies accountable for violating the integrity of the FDA’s efforts to ensure that doctors and patients have accurate information that allows them to make appropriate decisions about which drugs to use in their care. Working with the FDA and other law enforcement partners, we have sent a strong signal to the drug industry today.”</p>
<p>In a civil complaint filed today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia asserting claims under the FDCA, the government alleged that, at the time of Victoza’s approval in 2010, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required a REMS to mitigate the potential risk in humans of a rare form of cancer called Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma (MTC) associated with the drug. The REMS required Novo Nordisk to provide information regarding Victoza’s potential risk of MTC to physicians. A manufacturer that fails to comply with the requirements of the REMS, including requirements to communicate accurate risk information, renders the drug misbranded under the law.</p>
<p>As alleged in the complaint, some Novo Nordisk sales representatives gave information to physicians that created the false or misleading impression that the Victoza REMS-required message was erroneous, irrelevant, or unimportant. The complaint further alleges that Novo Nordisk failed to comply with the REMS by creating the false or misleading impression about the Victoza REMS-required risk message that violated provisions of the FDCA and led some physicians to be unaware of the potential risks when prescribing Victoza.</p>
<p>As alleged in the government’s complaint, after a survey in 2011 showed that half of primary care doctors polled were unaware of the potential risk of MTC associated with the drug, the FDA required a modification to the REMS to increase awareness of the potential risk. Rather than appropriately implementing the modification, the complaint alleges that Novo Nordisk instructed its sales force to provide statements to doctors that obscured the risk information and failed to comply with the REMS modification. Novo Nordisk has agreed to disgorge $12.15 million in profits derived from its unlawful conduct in violation of the FDCA.</p>
<p>“Novo Nordisk Inc. sales representatives misled physicians by failing to accurately disclose a potential life threatening side effect of a prescription drug, and needlessly increased risks to patients being treated with this drug,” said Assistant Director in Charge Andrew W. Vale of the FBI’s Washington Field Office. “The FBI is committed to ensuring that the private industry provides honest and accurate risk information to the public and will continue to work closely with our law enforcement partners to investigate companies who do not comply with FDA-mandated policies.”</p>
<p>“We need to trust that pharmaceutical companies truthfully represent their products’ potential risks,” said Special Agent in Charge Nick DiGiulio for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “We will continue to work with our partners to ensure federal health care dollars are spent only on drugs that are marketed honestly.”</p>
<p>Novo Nordisk will pay an additional $46.5 million to the federal government and the states to resolve claims under the FCA and state false claims acts. This portion of the settlement resolves allegations that Novo Nordisk caused the submission of false claims from 2010 to 2014 to federal health care programs for Victoza by arming its sales force with messages that could create a false or misleading impression with physicians that the Victoza REMS-required message about the potential risk of MTC associated with Victoza was erroneous, irrelevant, or unimportant and by encouraging the sale to and use of Victoza by adult patients who did not have Type II diabetes. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved Victoza as safe and effective for use by adult patients who do not have Type II diabetes.</p>
<p>As a result of today’s FCA settlement, the federal government will receive $43,129,026 and state Medicaid programs will receive $3,320,963. The Medicaid program is funded jointly by the state and federal governments.</p>
<p>The FCA settlement resolves seven lawsuits filed under the whistleblower provision of the federal FCA, which permits private parties to file suit on behalf of the United States for false claims and share in a portion of the government’s recovery. The civil lawsuits are captioned as follows: United States, et al. ex rel. Kennedy, v. Novo A/S, et al., No. 13-cv-01529 (D.D.C.), United States, et al. ex rel. Dastous, et al. v. Novo Nordisk, No. 11-cv-01662 (D.D.C), United States, et al., ex rel. Ferrara and Kelling v Novo Nordisk, Inc., et al., No. 1:11-cv-00074 (D.D.C.), United States, et al., ex rel. Myers v. Novo Nordisk, Inc., No. 11-cv-1596 (D.D.C.), United States, et al. ex rel Stepe v. Novo Nordisk, Inc., No. 13-cv-221 (D.D.C.), United States et al. ex rel Doe, et al. v. Novo Nordisk, Inc., et al., No. 1:17-00791 (D.D.C.), and United States ex rel. Smith, et al. v. Novo Nordisk, Inc., Civ. Action No. 16-1605 (D.D.C.). The amount to be recovered by the private parties has not been determined.</p>
<p>The settlements were the result of a coordinated effort among the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Civil Division’s Consumer Protection Branch and Commercial Litigation Branch, with assistance from the FDA’s Office of Chief Counsel. The investigation was conducted by the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations, the FBI, HHS-OIG, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service and the Office of Personnel Management, Office of the Inspector General.</p>
<p>For more information about the Consumer Protection Branch and its enforcement efforts, visit its website at http://www.justice.gov/civil/consumer-protection-branch. For more information on the Commercial Litigation Branch’s Fraud Section, visit https://www.justice.gov/civil/fraud-section. For more information about the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, visit https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/novo-nordisk-agrees-pay-58-million-failure-comply-fda-mandated-risk-program">Original PressReleases&#8230;</a></p>

Healthcare Fraud: Novo Nordisk Inc. Agrees to Pay to Resolve Allegations That The Company Failed to Comply For Its Type II Diabetes Medication

Novo Nordisk Agrees to Pay $58 Million For Failure to Comply With FDA-Mandated Risk Program
FraudsWatch is а site reporting on fraud and scammers on internet, in financial services and personal. Providing a daily news service publishes articles contributed by experts; is widely reported in thе latest compliance requirements, and offers very broad coverage of thе latest online theft cases, pending investigations and threats of fraud.
Leave a Comment


The Ultimate Guide to Avoiding Online Scams
Stay safe online! Our comprehensive 2025 guide covers phishing, AI scams, investment fraud & more. Learn red flags, prevention steps & how to report scams. Protect yourself now via Fraudswatch.com.
Read More
Categories
- AOL Aim Live ATT
- Celebrities Scammed
- Credit Card
- Credit Scam
- Email Man-Male Scammers
- Email Scam List
- Email Scams Examples
- Fraud
- Fraud News From World
- Fraud Prevention
- Gmail.com
- Hotmail.com
- Insurance
- Jobsearch Scams
- Loans
- Military Scammer
- Mortgage
- Nigerian 419
- Report Fraud
- Romance Scammer
- Russian Email Scam
- Scammer
- Scams Ways
- Shopping & Saving Money
- Spam
- White-Collar Crime
- Yahoo.com
Recent Posts
- The Unseen Battlefield: Your Definitive 2025 Guide to Advanced Scam Detection July 9, 2025
- Bulletproof Betrayal: Inside the $5.2 Million ShotStop Fraud That Sold Counterfeit Body Armor to America’s Law Enforcement July 8, 2025
- The Weapon of Experience: Inside the $28M Memphis Pharmacy Fraud and a Prior Conviction at the Heart of a Record-Breaking National Takedown July 2, 2025
- Chicago Businessman Convicted in $55 Million Fraud Scheme Targeting COVID-19 Relief Funds and Financial Institutions July 2, 2025
- Betrayal in the Classroom: An In-Depth Analysis of the Unprecedented Criminal Charges Against the School District of Philadelphia for Asbestos Failures June 28, 2025
Tags
Bank Fraud
Banking Fraud
Bankruptcy Fraud
Bribery Scheme
Business Fraud
Celebrities Scammed
Charity Fraud
Commodities Fraud
Consumer Fraud
Consumer Protection
COVID-19 relief fraud
Credit
Credit card
Credit Card Fraud
Credit Repair
Credit Repair Scams
Crime
Cyber Crime
Cybercrime
Cyber Criminals
Cybersecurity
data breach
Dating Scammer
Elder Fraud
Elder Justice
Email
Email Letter
Email Scam
Email Scam Examamples
Email Scam Example
Email Scam Examples
Email Scams
Email Scams Examples
False Claims Act
FBI
Fedex
Financial Crime
Financial Fraud
Fraud
fraud prevention
Fraud Scheme
Health
Health and Wellness Scams
Health Care Fraud
Healthcare Fraud
Identity Theft
Immigration Fraud
Insurance
Insurance Fraud
Internet Fraud
Investment Fraud
job
Job Scam
job scams
Loan
Loan Fraud
Loan Scam
Loans Fraud
Lottery Scam
Mail Fraud
Medicare Fraud
Microsoft
Military Scammer
Military Scammer LT. JEFFREY MILLER
Military Scammers
Money Laundering
Money Laundering Scheme
Mortgage
Mortgage Fraud
Mortgage Scam
Mortgage Scams
National Security
Nigerian
Nigerian 419
Nigerian Scam
online fraud
Online Scams
PayPal
personal information
Phishing
Phishing Scams
Ponzi Scheme
Public Corruption
Ransomware
Report Fraud
Romance Scam
Romance Scammer
Romance Scammers
Romance Scams
Scam
Scammer
Scammers
scams
Securities Fraud
spam
Tax Evasion
Tax Fraud
Travel Scams
White Collar Crimes
wire fraud