Tag Archives: air pollution

Fayat S.A.S. Hit with $11 Million Fine for Massive Clean Air Act Violations, EPA and DOJ Crack Down on Illegal Diesel Engine Imports

&NewLine;<p><strong>WASHINGTON&comma; D&period;C&period;<&sol;strong> – In a decisive move underscoring the U&period;S&period; government&&num;8217&semi;s commitment to enforcing environmental regulations&comma; the Department of Justice &lpar;DOJ&rpar; and the Environmental Protection Agency &lpar;EPA&rpar; have announced a landmark settlement agreement with French industrial conglomerate Fayat S&period;A&period;S&period; and nine of its subsidiaries&period; The agreement&comma; which includes a hefty &dollar;11 million civil penalty and a mandatory environmental mitigation project&comma; resolves allegations that Fayat and its subsidiaries flagrantly violated the Clean Air Act by importing and selling hundreds of non-compliant&comma; polluting pieces of heavy construction equipment into the United States between 2014 and 2018&period; This case marks a significant victory for environmental protection and public health&comma; sending a clear message to corporations that circumventing U&period;S&period; emission standards will not be tolerated&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading">A Pattern of Disregard&colon; Fayat&&num;8217&semi;s Multi-Year Violation of Emission Standards<&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The complaint&comma; lodged in the U&period;S&period; District Court for the District of Columbia&comma; paints a picture of a company that systematically disregarded critical environmental regulations for years&period; Fayat&comma; a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of construction equipment&comma; through its subsidiaries including BOMAG GmbH&comma; Bomag Americas Inc&period;&comma; MARINI S&period;p&period;A&period;&comma; and others&comma; allegedly imported and sold hundreds of pavers&comma; rollers&comma; and other nonroad equipment equipped with outdated diesel engines that failed to meet the stringent emission standards mandated by the Clean Air Act&period; These standards are designed to limit the release of harmful pollutants&comma; including nitrogen oxides &lpar;NOx&rpar; and particulate matter &lpar;PM&rpar;&comma; which are known to contribute to respiratory illnesses&comma; cardiovascular problems&comma; and other serious health issues&comma; as well as exacerbate climate change&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The equipment in question&comma; used in road construction and other heavy-duty applications&comma; failed to adhere to the emission control requirements&comma; which can vary by engine type and horsepower&period; This means that the imported machinery emitted significantly higher levels of harmful pollutants than allowed by law&comma; directly impacting air quality and posing a risk to public health&period; The alleged violations occurred between 2014 and 2018&period; The exact number of pieces of equipment was reported to be in the hundreds&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Furthermore&comma; the complaint alleges that Fayat failed to comply with the Clean Air Act&&num;8217&semi;s labeling and reporting requirements&period; This lack of transparency further complicated efforts by the EPA to track and regulate the emissions of these noncompliant machines&period; Proper labeling is crucial for identifying equipment that meets the required emission standards&comma; while accurate reporting enables authorities to monitor compliance and identify potential violations&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading">The &dollar;11 Million Price Tag&colon; Holding Fayat Accountable<&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The settlement agreement reached between the DOJ&comma; the EPA&comma; and Fayat is a decisive blow against corporate environmental negligence&period; The &dollar;11 million civil penalty imposed on Fayat is one of the largest ever levied for violations of the Clean Air Act&&num;8217&semi;s mobile source emission standards&period; This substantial penalty underscores the seriousness of Fayat&&num;8217&semi;s actions and serves as a powerful deterrent to other companies that might be tempted to cut corners on environmental compliance&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>&&num;8220&semi;Fayat failed to ensure that the equipment it introduced into the United States market complied with Clean Air Act requirements designed to protect the public’s health from harmful emissions&comma;&&num;8221&semi; stated Assistant Attorney General Todd Kim of the DOJ&&num;8217&semi;s Environment and Natural Resources Division &lpar;ENRD&rpar;&period; &&num;8220&semi;We will not tolerate violations of Clean Air Act standards&period; The settlement requires both a substantial civil penalty and a project that will reduce emissions in the Mobile&comma; Alabama&comma; area and contribute to improved public health&period;&&num;8221&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Acting Assistant Administrator Cecil Rodrigues for EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance echoed this sentiment&comma; highlighting the public health risks posed by Fayat&&num;8217&semi;s actions&period; &&num;8220&semi;Fayat’s import of nonroad vehicles with outdated diesel engines violates the Clean Air Act standards for emissions from mobile sources and threatened exposure to harmful diesel air emissions&comma;&&num;8221&semi; Rodrigues said&period; &&num;8220&semi;Today’s announcement demonstrates that EPA will hold accountable companies that put outdated equipment into commerce that pollutes the air and risks exposing communities to toxic air pollutants&period;&&num;8221&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading">Beyond the Fine&colon; A Project to Mitigate Environmental Harm<&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>In addition to the substantial <a class&equals;"wpil&lowbar;keyword&lowbar;link" href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;fraudswatch&period;com&sol;tag&sol;financial-fraud&sol;" title&equals;"financial" data-wpil-keyword-link&equals;"linked" data-wpil-monitor-id&equals;"1109">financial<&sol;a> penalty&comma; Fayat is required to undertake a specific environmental mitigation project aimed at reducing the harm caused by its past violations&period; This project focuses on retrofitting a tugboat currently in service in Mobile&comma; Alabama&period; Tugboats are known for their significant emissions&comma; and this particular project represents a targeted effort to address the localized air quality impacts of Fayat&&num;8217&semi;s actions&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The retrofit will involve the removal and destruction of two existing main engines and two auxiliary generators&comma; replacing them with two new&comma; modern engines and two new generators that meet the most stringent current emission control standards&period; This upgrade will result in a substantial reduction of NOx and PM emissions from the tugboat&comma; contributing to cleaner air in the Mobile&comma; Alabama&comma; area&period; The choice of Mobile&comma; Alabama&comma; is particularly significant&comma; as it is a major port city and industrial hub&comma; where air quality is already a concern&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The project to reduce the harm from emissions will cost an unspecified amount&comma; but it adds to the total price Fayat will pay for its years of Clean Air Act Violations&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading">The Implications&colon; A Clear Message to Industry<&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>This settlement sends a clear and unambiguous message to the construction equipment industry and beyond&colon; compliance with environmental regulations is not optional&period; The EPA and DOJ have demonstrated their commitment to vigorously enforcing the Clean Air Act and holding companies accountable for their actions&period; This case serves as a stark reminder that cutting corners on emission standards can lead to severe financial penalties&comma; reputational damage&comma; and mandatory mitigation projects&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The Fayat case also highlights the importance of proactive compliance measures&period; Companies operating in the United States must be aware of and adhere to all applicable environmental regulations&comma; including those governing mobile source emissions&period; This includes ensuring that imported equipment meets U&period;S&period; emission standards&comma; properly labeling equipment&comma; and maintaining accurate records&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading">Public Comment and Final Approval<&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The proposed consent decree&comma; which outlines the terms of the settlement agreement&comma; is subject to a public comment period before it receives final approval from the U&period;S&period; District Court for the District of Columbia&period; This period allows stakeholders&comma; including members of the public and environmental advocacy groups&comma; to review the proposed settlement and submit their comments to the court&period; This process ensures transparency and public accountability in the enforcement of environmental laws&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Information on how to submit comments and access the full settlement agreement is available on the Department of Justice&&num;8217&semi;s website&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading">Conclusion&colon; A Victory for Clean Air and Public Health<&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The settlement agreement with Fayat represents a significant victory for the EPA&comma; the DOJ&comma; and the American public&period; It underscores the government&&num;8217&semi;s commitment to protecting air quality and public health by enforcing the Clean Air Act&period; The substantial penalty and the mandatory mitigation project serve as a powerful deterrent to other companies that might be tempted to prioritize profits over environmental compliance&period; This case sets a strong precedent for future enforcement actions and reinforces the importance of rigorous adherence to environmental regulations in all industries&period; It&&num;8217&semi;s a clear win for clean air and a step towards a healthier environment for all Americans&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;epa&period;gov&sol;enforcement&sol;fayat-clean-air-act-settlement-summary" data-type&equals;"link" data-id&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;epa&period;gov&sol;enforcement&sol;fayat-clean-air-act-settlement-summary">More info &&num;8230&semi;<&sol;a><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><&sol;p>&NewLine;