Financial Fraud: Salil Parulekar Indicted For Orchestrated An Embezzlement Scheme at Tesla Inc.

<h2>Former Tesla Employee Charged In Embezzlement Scheme At Tesla<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><strong>Approximately &dollar;9&period;3 Million Allegedly Embezzled in 2016 and 2017<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;<div class&equals;"mh-content-ad"><script async src&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;pagead2&period;googlesyndication&period;com&sol;pagead&sol;js&sol;adsbygoogle&period;js&quest;client&equals;ca-pub-9162800720558968"&NewLine; crossorigin&equals;"anonymous"><&sol;script>&NewLine;<ins class&equals;"adsbygoogle"&NewLine; style&equals;"display&colon;block&semi; text-align&colon;center&semi;"&NewLine; data-ad-layout&equals;"in-article"&NewLine; data-ad-format&equals;"fluid"&NewLine; data-ad-client&equals;"ca-pub-9162800720558968"&NewLine; data-ad-slot&equals;"1081854981"><&sol;ins>&NewLine;<script>&NewLine; &lpar;adsbygoogle &equals; window&period;adsbygoogle &vert;&vert; &lbrack;&rsqb;&rpar;&period;push&lpar;&lbrace;&rcub;&rpar;&semi;&NewLine;<&sol;script><&sol;div>&NewLine;<p>SAN JOSE – A federal grand jury issued an indictment against Salil Parulekar today&comma; charging him with engaging in an embezzlement scheme&comma; announced United States Attorney Alex G&period; Tse and Federal Bureau of Investigation &lpar;FBI&rpar; Special Agent in Charge John F&period; Bennett&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>According to the indictment&comma; during 2016 and 2017&comma; Parulekar&comma; 32&comma; formerly of San Jose&comma; orchestrated an embezzlement scheme at Tesla Inc&period; &lpar;&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Tesla”&rpar;&period; At the time&comma; Parulekar was an employee in the Global Supply Management group at Tesla&period; He was responsible for overseeing Tesla’s relationship with certain suppliers for various parts and services related to Tesla automobiles&period; Parulekar allegedly used his role to initiate a scheme wherein he diverted money owed to one Tesla supplier and caused it to be paid to another supplier&period; In sum&comma; Parulekar allegedly embezzled approximately &dollar;9&period;3 million&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>According to the indictment&comma; Parulekar learned in January 2017 that Tesla had terminated its supplier relationship with Schwabische Huttenwerke Automotive GmbH &lpar;&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;SHW”&rpar;&period; At the time of the termination&comma; SHW had only provided a limited number of sample products&comma; specifically&comma; motor pumps&comma; to Tesla&period; Parulekar allegedly knew the termination meant that Tesla was withholding future payments to SHW and that Parulekar was not authorized to contravene this decision&period; Notwithstanding these facts&comma; Parulekar redirected a series of payments intended for another supplier&comma; Hota Industrial Manufacturing Co&period;&comma; Ltd&period; &lpar;&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Hota”&rpar;&comma; and caused them to be paid to SHW&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The indictment alleges Parulekar caused the diversion of payments by falsifying invoices&semi; creating fraudulent accounts payable documents&comma; such as bank account information and wire instructions&semi; and impersonating Hota employees&period; Specifically&comma; Parulekar allegedly stole the identity of a Hota employee and&comma; by impersonating the employee&comma; deceived Tesla’s Accounts Payable division into switching the bank account information for Hota and SHW&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Parulekar was charged with nine counts of wire fraud&comma; in violation of 18 U&period;S&period;C&period; § 1343&comma; and one count of aggravated <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;fraudswatch&period;com&sol;loans-fraud-getting-a-loan-after-identity-theft&sol;amp&sol;">identity theft<&sol;a>&comma; in violation of 18 U&period;S&period;C&period; § 1028A&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed&comma; and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt&period; If convicted&comma; the maximum penalty for each count of wire fraud is twenty years’ imprisonment and a &dollar;250&comma;000 fine&period; The maximum sentence for aggravated identity theft&comma; in violation of 18 U&period;S&period;C&period; § 1028A&comma; is two years in prison—to be served consecutively to the underlying felony—and a &dollar;250&comma;000 fine&period; Any sentence following conviction would be imposed by the court only after consideration of the U&period;S&period; Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence&comma; 18 U&period;S&period;C&period; § 3553&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Assistant U&period;S&period; Attorney Patrick R&period; Delahunty is prosecuting the case with the assistance of Susan Kreider&period; The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the FBI&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Financial Fraud