<p><strong>NEW YORK</strong> – In a significant blow to its reputation and finances, American Express Company (AMEX) has agreed to a hefty settlement exceeding $138 million after admitting to deceptive sales practices involving two of its wire transfer products, Payroll Rewards and Premium Wire (PR/PW). The settlement, announced by Judy Philips, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Harry T. Chavis, Jr., Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) New York Field Office, marks a sobering chapter in the financial giant&#8217;s history, revealing a calculated scheme to mislead customers with inaccurate tax advice for profit.</p>



<div class="mh-content-ad"><script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-9162800720558968"
 crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
 style="display:block; text-align:center;"
 data-ad-layout="in-article"
 data-ad-format="fluid"
 data-ad-client="ca-pub-9162800720558968"
 data-ad-slot="1081854981"></ins>
<script>
 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script></div>
<p>This article delves deep into the intricate details of the AMEX scandal, exploring the mechanics of the deceitful marketing campaign, the fallout for the company and its employees, the specifics of the non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and the broader implications for the <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://www.fraudswatch.com/tag/financial-fraud/amp/" title="financial" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="1110">financial</a> industry.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Genesis of Deception: How AMEX Lured Customers with False Promises</h2>



<p>The saga began in April 2018 with the launch of &#8220;Payroll Rewards,&#8221; a wire product marketed to businesses as a convenient way to process payroll through direct payments from AMEX accounts. The allure wasn&#8217;t just convenience; it was the promise of accumulating Membership Rewards (MR) points, a coveted perk in the AMEX ecosystem. Customers earned one MR point for every dollar wired, with these points redeemable across various personal and business accounts.</p>



<p>On the surface, this seemed like a win-win. However, AMEX&#8217;s pricing strategy raised eyebrows. While competitors offered wiring services for nominal fees, often between $0 and $50 regardless of the wire amount, AMEX imposed a percentage-based fee ranging from 1.77% to a staggering 3.5% of the total wired sum. This meant that a company wiring $100,000 could be hit with fees as high as $3,500 by AMEX, compared to a maximum of $50 from competitors.</p>



<p>To justify these exorbitant fees, AMEX employed a carefully crafted sales pitch, a narrative that, as investigations later revealed, was built on a foundation of false tax advice. In May 2019, AMEX expanded the program to include &#8220;Premium Wire,&#8221; broadening the scope beyond payroll to encompass all types of wire payments. While Payroll Rewards underwent some degree of internal compliance review, Premium Wire was rushed to market with minimal scrutiny, treated as a mere &#8220;spin-off&#8221; product. This lack of oversight proved to be a critical error, setting the stage for widespread misconduct.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Pitch: A Calculated Scheme to Exploit Tax Law Loopholes That Didn&#8217;t Exist</h2>



<p>The heart of the scandal lies in the deceptive sales pitch, which the government meticulously documented. AMEX&#8217;s sales teams, primarily within the Global Commercial Services and FX International Payments divisions, aggressively targeted small and mid-sized businesses. These businesses, often prioritizing tax optimization over raw profitability, were particularly susceptible to the allure of the pitch.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Here&#8217;s how the &#8220;Pitch&#8221; worked:</h3>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>False Claim of Full Tax Deductibility:</strong> Sales representatives asserted that the hefty wire fees were fully tax-deductible as a &#8220;business expense.&#8221; This, they claimed, would effectively lower the company&#8217;s overall profit and, consequently, its taxable income.</li>



<li><strong>Misrepresentation of True Cost:</strong> Customers were told that the &#8220;true cost&#8221; of the fees needed to be viewed in the context of their effective tax rate. The argument was that since they would have otherwise paid taxes on the amount spent on fees, the net cost was significantly less.</li>



<li><strong>The Myth of Tax-Free Rewards:</strong> Perhaps the most egregious element of the pitch was the assertion that the MR points earned were entirely &#8220;tax-free.&#8221; This meant that the value of the points, which could be redeemed for various benefits, supposedly outweighed the adjusted cost of the fees, making the entire proposition a net gain for the customer.</li>
</ol>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Reality: A Gross Misinterpretation of Tax Law</h2>



<p>The IRS-CI investigation quickly unraveled the elaborate charade. The &#8220;Pitch&#8221; was based on a fundamental misinterpretation, or perhaps a deliberate distortion, of basic tax principles. The claim that the wiring fees were fully deductible was patently false.</p>



<p>According to the IRS, for a business expense to be deductible, it must be both &#8220;ordinary&#8221; and &#8220;necessary.&#8221; Incurring a wiring fee that was orders of magnitude higher than market rates, solely to generate a personal benefit in the form of MR points, simply does not meet this criterion. Paying 50 to 100 times the market rate for a wire is not a normal expense in any way. In the words of the IRS, it&#8217;s neither &#8220;ordinary&#8221; nor &#8220;necessary&#8221; for the operation of a legitimate business. It is a violation of the Tax code.</p>



<p>Moreover, the claim that MR points are earned tax-free is a gross oversimplification. While the IRS has not always been consistent in its treatment of reward points, they are generally considered taxable when they represent a significant financial benefit or are directly linked to a business transaction. In this case, the MR points were explicitly tied to the inflated wire fees, making them highly likely to be subject to taxation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Fallout: Hundreds of Jobs Lost, a Tarnished Reputation, and a $138 Million Bill</h2>



<p>The consequences for AMEX were swift and severe. As internal concerns about the PR/PW marketing practices mounted in early 2021, an internal investigation was launched. This investigation unearthed a deeply ingrained culture of misconduct, leading to the termination of approximately 200 employees implicated in the scheme.</p>



<p>In the summer of 2021, AMEX attempted to mitigate the damage by halting new enrollments in the PR/PW program. A cap of $280,000 per wire was instituted in September 2021, a tacit acknowledgment of the exorbitant fees being charged. Finally, in November 2021, the PR/PW program was discontinued entirely.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Non-Prosecution Agreement: A Steep Price for Corporate Misconduct</h2>



<p>The NPA reached between AMEX and the U.S. Attorney&#8217;s Office for the Eastern District of New York represents a significant financial penalty and a stern warning to other financial institutions. AMEX agreed to pay a criminal fine of $77,696,000 and forfeit an additional $60,700,000, representing the net revenue directly attributable to the sale of PR/PW.</p>



<p>In a separate but related civil settlement with the Department of Justice&#8217;s Civil Division Fraud Section, AMEX agreed to pay a further $60,700,000 civil penalty. To avoid double-counting, both the U.S. Attorney&#8217;s Office and the Civil Division agreed to credit approximately $30,350,000 of the forfeiture amount and civil fine towards their respective resolutions, bringing the total financial penalty to over $138 million.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Beyond the Money: Cooperation, Remediation, and the Path Forward</h2>



<p>The NPA is not just about financial penalties; it&#8217;s also about ensuring future compliance and holding AMEX accountable for its actions. The agreement mandates that AMEX continue to fully cooperate with the government&#8217;s investigation for at least 36 months. This includes providing access to relevant documents, data, and personnel. Any violation of the NPA could lead to prosecution for the original misconduct, as well as any newly discovered criminal activity.</p>



<p>The government acknowledged AMEX&#8217;s &#8220;substantial remedial measures&#8221; taken since 2021, including the termination of involved employees, the discontinuation of PR/PW, and improvements to internal audit and product approval processes. These actions, along with AMEX&#8217;s lack of prior criminal history in the past 18 years, were considered mitigating factors in the negotiation of the NPA.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Broader Implications: A Warning for the Financial Industry</h2>



<p>The AMEX scandal serves as a stark reminder of the importance of ethical conduct and rigorous compliance in the financial industry. It underscores the risks of prioritizing profits over integrity and the potential consequences of turning a blind eye to questionable sales practices.</p>



<p>&#8220;Financial institutions like American Express have no business pitching inaccurate tax avoidance schemes to sell products and turn a quick profit,&#8221; stated Acting U.S. Attorney Philips. &#8220;This resolution ensures that American Express will be held financially accountable for the unacceptable conduct of its sales employees in misrepresenting the tax benefits of these products.&#8221;</p>



<p>IRS-CI Special Agent in Charge Chavis echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that &#8220;every business is required to comply with the laws of this nation, including all tax laws.&#8221;</p>



<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p>



<p>The AMEX PR/PW scandal is a cautionary tale of corporate greed, deceptive marketing, and the erosion of trust. It highlights the critical need for robust internal controls, ethical leadership, and a commitment to compliance within the financial industry. As the dust settles on this costly settlement, AMEX faces the arduous task of rebuilding its reputation and regaining the trust of its customers. The case also serves as a warning to other financial institutions: the pursuit of profit must never come at the expense of integrity and adherence to the law. The IRS and other regulatory bodies are watching, and the consequences of misconduct can be severe and long-lasting.</p>



<p><a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/american-express-agrees-pay-more-138-million-resolve-wire-fraud-investigation">Original PressReleases&#8230; </a></p>